Election Crime Bureau

Made possible by the Lindell Offense Fund

Congressional Deliberation Suppressed by Media Characterization of Pennsylvania Legislative Dispute as “Baseless” Despite Formal Resolution (PA)

Reasonable Inference

[Reasonable Inference – Impact on congressional deliberation] The Pennsylvania State Legislature filed a formal resolution explicitly urging the U.S. Congress to declare Pennsylvania’s presidential electors “in dispute,” citing the executive branch’s unlawful infringement of the General Assembly’s constitutional authority. This was an official legislative act – yet major media organizations characterized the legislative dispute as a partisan maneuver and “baseless” effort to overturn a settled result. The practical effect was that one branch of Pennsylvania government’s formal legal objection was framed by the media as political theater rather than a constitutionally cognizable dispute. Congressional members deliberating on Pennsylvania’s electors on January 6, 2021, operated in a media environment in which this formally transmitted legislative objection had been effectively dismissed as meritless before any evidentiary review occurred.

Citations

Senate Resolution 410 PN2133: https://www.palegis.us/legislation/bills/text/PDF/2019/0/SR0410/PN2133 | Pennsylvania General Assembly

Senate Resolution 410 Information: https://www.palegis.us/legislation/bills/2019/sr410 | Pennsylvania General Assembly

The New Yorker, “Trump’s Battle to Undermine the Vote in Pennsylvania” (Nov. 27, 2020) (quoting Pennsylvania Attorney General Josh Shapiro describing the underlying legislative activity as “purely political theater”), available at https://www.newyorker.com/news/us-journal/trumps-battle-to-undermine-the-vote-in-pennsylvania.

League of Conservation Voters, roll call vote record, “Certifying Pennsylvania’s Electoral Votes” (Jan. 7, 2021) (Senate rejected Pennsylvania objection 7–92), available at https://www.lcv.org/roll-call-vote/certifying-pennsylvanias-electoral-votes-2/