Election Crime Bureau

Made possible by the Lindell Offense Fund

ActBlue “Smurf” Micro‑Donations into Federal Races (US)

Disputed Fact

A review of public Federal Election Commission records, combined with independent data analysis and congressional investigation, has identified unusually dense patterns of small-dollar contributions routed through ActBlue donor accounts associated with elderly or low-income individuals, some with hundreds or thousands of transactions attributed to their names in a single election cycle. In several documented cases, individuals signed sworn affidavits attesting that the contribution frequency and dollar amounts reflected in FEC records did not correspond to donations they made. A data analysis by the House Committee on Administration, comparing over 200 million FEC contribution records against consumer purchasing data, voter rolls, and net worth databases, found donations “significantly disproportionate to a person’s net worth or previous giving history” and “unusually frequent donations from the elderly and first-time donors,” which the Committee characterized as potential evidence of unlawful exploitation of unwitting “straw donors” in violation of 52 U.S.C. § 30122.

A subsequent joint interim staff report issued by three House committees on April 2, 2025 — “Fraud on ActBlue: How the Democrats’ Top Fundraising Platform Opens the Door for Illegal Election Contributions” — documented that ActBlue relaxed its fraud-prevention standards twice in 2024, internally directed new employees to “look for reasons to accept contributions,” and detected at least 22 “significant fraud campaigns,” nearly half with a foreign nexus. On April 24, 2025, a presidential memorandum directed the Attorney General and Secretary of the Treasury to investigate “schemes to launder excessive and prohibited contributions to political candidates and committees” through online fundraising platforms, citing concerns about straw donations attributed to individuals “potentially without the consent or even knowledge of the putative contributors.” A separate FEC complaint filed in 2026 alleged, based on forensic analysis of over 1.08 billion FEC Schedule A records, that 41,457 donor accounts used USPS-confirmed non-existent addresses and that 402,872 donor identities exceeded the $200 itemization threshold in aggregate while never making a single transaction at or above that threshold — a pattern the complaint characterized as deliberate structuring to evade reporting requirements.

No enforcement action, indictment, or final FEC adjudication has issued as of the date of this writing. ActBlue has denied systemic wrongdoing and has attributed anomalies in part to FEC reporting conventions for intermediary platforms.

Citations

“ActBlue statement: “This investigation is nothing more than a partisan political attack and scare tactic to undermine the power of Democratic and progressive small-dollar donors.” ActBlue has further stated that FEC reporting conventions for intermediary platforms cause contributions to appear duplicated in public records, and that common names may cause aggregation errors. See Alpha News (Sept. 20, 2024), https://alphanews.org/congressional-probe-into-political-fundraising-platform-actblue-finds-potential-criminal-activity/

Cybersecurity professional Dominic Rapini identified FEC records attributing approximately $1.9 million in small-dollar ActBlue contributions to 18 Connecticut residents, most over age 70, between 2016 and 2024. In two documented cases: Clifford Slayman (retired Yale professor, 80s) signed an affidavit in April 2023 attesting that FEC records showing 7,539 donations totaling $213,163 in his name “does not reflect my donation frequency or dollars I have donated”; Barbara Schmerzler (retired real estate broker, 80s) signed an affidavit in May 2023 attesting that 2,591 donations totaling $41,000 attributed to her did not reflect her actual giving. In 2021, Schmerzler’s FEC record showed 1,523 donations averaging $4.83 each — more than 4 per day. See Dominic Rapini analysis as reported in Inside Investigator (June 2, 2025), https://insideinvestigator.org/acting-blue-evidence-of-fraudulent-political-donations-targeting-retirees/ ; The Daily Signal (Jan. 8, 2025), https://www.dailysignal.com/2025/01/08/elderly-democrats-say-thousands-donations-actblue-were-made-fraudulently-their-names/O’Keefe Media Group reported comparable patterns in Maryland and elsewhere in March 2023, with donors denying having made thousands of donations totaling over $200,000. See also Sen. Marco Rubio letter to FEC (April 12, 2023), as reported in Fox News, https://www.foxnews.com/politics/rubio-demands-probe-actblue-reports-fraudulent-fundraising-off-seniors.

House Committee on Administration, October 29, 2024 letter from Chairman Bryan Steil to ActBlue: “the Committee conducted a comprehensive data analysis, comparing over 200 million FEC donation records with data on age, party affiliation, number of donations, consumer purchasing power, and net worth. This study revealed several anomalies and mismatches in the FEC records.” Findings included “donations significantly disproportionate to a person’s net worth or previous giving history” and “unusually frequent donations from the elderly and first-time donors.” On September 18, 2024, Chairman Steil sent referral letters to the Attorneys General of Texas, Virginia, Arkansas, Florida, and Missouri citing potential “criminal activity” and “potential unlawful exploitation of unwitting ‘straw donors,’ whose identities may have been used to channel illicit funds into campaigns in your state.” See Committee on House Administration press release (Oct. 29, 2024), https://cha.house.gov/2024/10/chairman-steil-demands-information-from-actblue-on-potential-foreign-influence-in-campaign-funding; Committee on House Administration subpoena findings (Dec. 10, 2024), https://republicans-cha.house.gov/2024/12/chairman-steil-releases-findings-from-subpoena-of-actblue.

House Committee on Administration, House Committee on the Judiciary, and House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, Fraud on ActBlue: How the Democrats’ Top Fundraising Platform Opens the Door for Illegal Election Contributions (Joint Interim Staff Report, April 2, 2025). Report findings include: ActBlue relaxed fraud-prevention rules twice in 2024 (April and September); internal training guide directed new employees to “look for reasons to accept contributions”; chief fraud-prevention official willing to accept “10 percent more fraud”; ActBlue detected 237 donations from foreign IP addresses using prepaid cards in a 30-day window (Sept.–Oct. 2024); internal communications document awareness of fraud without remedial action. See Committee on House Administration press release, https://republicans-cha.house.gov/2025/4/new-staff-report-details-actblue-s-unserious-approach-to-fraud-prevention .

Presidential Memorandum, Investigation into Unlawful “Straw Donor” and Foreign Contributions in American Elections (April 24, 2025): “[P]ress reports and investigations by congressional committees have generated extremely troubling evidence that online fundraising platforms have been willing participants in schemes to launder excessive and prohibited contributions to political candidates and committees. Specifically, these reports raise concerns that malign actors are seeking to evade Federal source and amount limitations on political contributions by breaking down large contributions from one source into many smaller contributions, nominally attributed to numerous other individuals, potentially without the consent or even knowledge of the putative contributors.” The memorandum directed the Attorney General and Secretary of the Treasury to investigate under 52 U.S.C. §§ 30121 (foreign contributions) and 30122 (contributions in the name of another). White House, https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/04/investigation-into-unlawful-straw-donor-and-foreign-contributions-in-american-elections/