Disputed Fact On August 19, 2024, Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson used Twitter to address various election-related assertions that she found on social media. One of the questions that she addressed was the following: “Are plans in place in case some counties don’t want to certify” Joan Crawford’s Eyebrows (@sanjose172) Benson’s response? “Yes. If […]
MI SoS to County Canvassers: “We will come for you” Read More »
The June 2, 2026 California Statewide Primary resulted in competitive races for both Los Angeles Mayor and Governor, with results still being tallied through the seven-day post-Election Day window and into the 30-day official canvass period. This plan provides a structured investigative framework — grounded in California statutory law, federal election statutes, and procedural rights
California Election Investigation Action Plan Read More »
Established Fact In June 2022, the three‑member Otero County Commission, acting as the county canvassing board, voted unanimously not to certify the June 7 primary election results. Commissioners cited “distrust of Dominion vote‑tallying machines” and dissatisfaction with the state’s prior audit of the 2020 results as their basis. Underscores need for transparency in the conduct
Established Fact [Established Fact – As to subsequent court rulings] The Wisconsin 2020 presidential election certification incorporated votes cast under at least four categories of procedures subsequently found unlawful: (1) absentee ballot drop boxes, ruled illegal by Waukesha County Circuit Court in Teigen v. WEC (affirmed, 2022 WI 64); (2) absentee ballots collected from nursing
Established Fact On November 30, 2020, Wisconsin Elections Commission (WEC) Chairperson Ann Jacobs unilaterally signed the “determination of the recount and the presidential contest” without conducting a full vote of the Wisconsin Elections Commission or obtaining recorded approval from the broader Commission membership. This action was taken in the final hours before Governor Tony Evers
Established Fact Secretary of the Commonwealth Kathy Boockvar unilaterally and prematurely certified the statewide presidential election results on November 24, 2020, before Philadelphia County and Allegheny County had completed uploading their voter histories to Pennsylvania’s Statewide Uniform Registry of Electors (SURE system). The consequence of this premature certification is mathematically irreconcilable: Representative Francis Ryan’s December
Disputed Fact [Disputed Fact – As to ultimate legal effect on certification validity] The Pennsylvania Election Code, as enacted by the General Assembly in Act 77 of 2019, specified four specific mail ballot requirements: (1) all ballots received after 8:00 p.m. on Election Day shall not be counted; (2) all mail-in ballots must include a
Established Fact In the weeks preceding the November 2020 general election, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court and Secretary of the Commonwealth Kathy Boockvar altered four core provisions of Pennsylvania’s mail ballot law — Act 77 of 2019 — without action by the General Assembly. First, Act 77 unambiguously required all mailed ballots to be received by
Disputed Fact Pennsylvania Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar certified the 2020 presidential election on November 24, 2020, despite an irreconcilable discrepancy between the certified vote total and the Commonwealth’s own official voter record. Pennsylvania’s SURE system is, by statute, the official voter record of the Commonwealth. A December 20, 2020 interim analysis of SURE data
Reasonable Inference [Reasonable Inference – Coordination and systemic characterization] Across all five major battleground states, the documentary record establishes a consistent pattern: state certifying officials were in possession of material adverse information – including documented record deficiencies, unresolved statutory violations, active litigation, and in multiple instances formal legislative or audit findings – at the time
