Judicial Malfeasance

Raffensperger Congressional Letter – Material Omissions and False Statements to Congress (GA)

Established Fact [Established Fact – Letter transmitted; Ligon Report omitted; 250 investigations inconsistency documented] On January 6, 2021, Secretary Raffensperger transmitted a ten-page letter to Congress asserting in substance that “no fraud or irregularities occurred at all in Georgia.” VoterGA researchers identified 42 alleged false statements in the letter. The letter omitted: the Georgia Senate […]

Raffensperger Congressional Letter – Material Omissions and False Statements to Congress (GA) Read More »

Secretary Raffensperger’s False Representations to Congress – Affirmative Disinformation Campaign by State Official to Foreclose Federal Scrutiny (GA)

Established Fact [Established Fact – As to contradictions, omissions, and ProV&V timing] Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger transmitted a ten-page letter to the United States Congress on January 6, 2021, in which he represented, in substance, that “no fraud or irregularities occurred at all” in Georgia’s 2020 election. This representation: (1) was made with knowledge

Secretary Raffensperger’s False Representations to Congress – Affirmative Disinformation Campaign by State Official to Foreclose Federal Scrutiny (GA) Read More »

Mesa County, CO Election System Discoveries Made Possible by Tina Peters

Established Fact Tina Peters is the former Mesa County, CO clerk who was sentenced to nine years in prison for making forensic copies of her Dominion Election Management System (EMS) server in the wake of the 2020 election cycle.  In so doing, Tina prevented the destruction of election records for both the 2020 and 2021

Mesa County, CO Election System Discoveries Made Possible by Tina Peters Read More »

False Statements to Congress in Raffensperger’s January 6, 2021 Congressional Letter (GA)

Established Fact On January 6, 2021, Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger transmitted a ten-page letter to the U.S. Congress, including then-Vice President Pence, in which he stated that the results reported by Georgia’s voting systems “were accurate” and that “there is nowhere close to sufficient evidence to put in doubt the results of the presidential

False Statements to Congress in Raffensperger’s January 6, 2021 Congressional Letter (GA) Read More »

Director Baxter’s Denial Under Oath – Knowingly False Official Statement at Certification

Disputed Fact [Disputed Fact – As to whether knowing or truthful] During the November 23, 2020 State Board of Canvassers certification meeting, State Board member Norman Shinkle directly asked Detroit Department of Elections Director Daniel Baxter whether he had provided revised poll lists to the Wayne County Board of Canvassers. Baxter answered: “No. I’m not

Director Baxter’s Denial Under Oath – Knowingly False Official Statement at Certification Read More »

Director Baxter’s Denial Under Oath – False Official Statement at Certification (MI)

Established Fact [Established Fact – Denial made and documented contemporaneously] During the November 23, 2020 State Board of Canvassers certification meeting, State Board member Norman Shinkle directly asked Detroit Department of Elections Director Daniel Baxter whether he had provided revised poll lists to the Wayne County Board of Canvassers. Baxter answered: “No. I’m not aware

Director Baxter’s Denial Under Oath – False Official Statement at Certification (MI) Read More »

Materially False and Omitted Statements to Congress – Raffensperger January 6 Letter (GA)

Established Fact On January 6, 2021, Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger transmitted a ten-page letter to Congress and Vice President Pence representing that no fraud or irregularities occurred in Georgia. The letter was not made public for several months after its transmission. A subsequent analysis by VoterGA identified what researchers characterized as 42 false or

Materially False and Omitted Statements to Congress – Raffensperger January 6 Letter (GA) Read More »

Coordinated Use of Standing Dismissals, Rule 11 Sanctions Threats, and Attorney Discipline to Deter Election Integrity Litigation (MI)

Disputed Fact Multiple attorneys who filed election integrity challenges in Michigan faced concurrent financial and professional consequences initiated or recommended by federal and state officials. In August 2021, U.S. District Judge Linda V. Parker sanctioned Sidney Powell, Lin Wood, Stefanie Lambert, and six other attorneys for the King v. Whitmer challenge, ordering monetary payment of

Coordinated Use of Standing Dismissals, Rule 11 Sanctions Threats, and Attorney Discipline to Deter Election Integrity Litigation (MI) Read More »

Prolific Use of Standing Dismissals, Rule 11 Sanctions Threats, and Attorney Discipline to Deter Election Integrity Litigation (MI)

Established Fact [Established Fact – As to procedural dismissal rates, Clare Locke letters, anti-analysis clause, and Bailey dismissal basis] The Michigan source record, corroborated by the national elections litigation analysis in the project files, establishes that the characterization of all Michigan post-2020 election cases as having been dismissed “for lack of evidence” is factually inaccurate.

Prolific Use of Standing Dismissals, Rule 11 Sanctions Threats, and Attorney Discipline to Deter Election Integrity Litigation (MI) Read More »

OSC Legislative Investigation Subjected to Three Simultaneous Dane County Lawsuits – Judicial Resources as Obstruction Tool (WI)

Reasonable Inference [Reasonable Inference – Resource drain on investigative function was the practical effect] The Wisconsin Legislature’s Office of the Special Counsel (OSC) under Special Counsel Michael Gableman faced three separate, simultaneous lawsuits filed against it in Dane County Circuit Court – a Democratic-leaning jurisdiction. These actions forced the OSC to expend significant investigative resources

OSC Legislative Investigation Subjected to Three Simultaneous Dane County Lawsuits – Judicial Resources as Obstruction Tool (WI) Read More »