Lawfare

Lawfare Waged Against True the Vote (US)

Disputed Fact, Judicial Malfeasance, Lawfare, United States /

Disputed Fact True the Vote (TTV) — the Texas-based nonprofit led by founder Catherine Engelbrecht and longtime board member/contractor Gregg Phillips — became one of the most aggressively targeted election integrity organizations in the wake of the 2020 election. The organization, whose research underpinned the controversial 2000 Mules documentary, faced federal contempt proceedings, criminal referrals, […]

Lawfare Waged Against True the Vote (US) Read More »

Lawfare Waged Against President Trump (US)

Disputed Fact, Judicial Malfeasance, Lawfare, United States /

Disputed Fact No person in American history has faced a more comprehensive, simultaneous array of criminal indictments, civil suits, congressional proceedings, and institutional actions than Donald Trump in the years following the 2020 election. Trump and his supporters have consistently characterized these legal actions as coordinated political warfare — “lawfare” — deployed by opponents who

Lawfare Waged Against President Trump (US) Read More »

Lawfare Waged Against Patrick Byrne (US)

Disputed Fact, Judicial Malfeasance, Lawfare, United States /

Disputed Fact Patrick Byrne — the multimillionaire founder and former CEO of Overstock.com — became one of the most heavily targeted private citizens in the post-2020 election legal and political landscape. A central figure in the effort to challenge the 2020 election results, Byrne participated in the now-infamous December 18, 2020 Oval Office meeting alongside

Lawfare Waged Against Patrick Byrne (US) Read More »

Lawfare Waged Against Mike Lindell (US)

Disputed Fact, Judicial Malfeasance, Lawfare, United States /

Disputed Fact Mike Lindell, CEO of MyPillow and one of the most prominent public voices asserting that the 2020 presidential election was stolen, became the target of one of the most sustained multi-front legal, financial, and corporate pressure campaigns waged against any private citizen in post-election American history. From defamation suits worth billions, to FBI

Lawfare Waged Against Mike Lindell (US) Read More »

Mesa County, CO Election System Discoveries Made Possible by Tina Peters

Colorado, Deployment Configuration, Electronic Voting System Integrity, Established Fact, Featured, Featured, Judicial Malfeasance, Lawfare, Press Release, Remote Access, Security Negligence, System Certification, United States /

Established Fact Tina Peters is the former Mesa County, CO clerk who was sentenced to nine years in prison for making forensic copies of her Dominion Election Management System (EMS) server in the wake of the 2020 election cycle.  In so doing, Tina prevented the destruction of election records for both the 2020 and 2021

Mesa County, CO Election System Discoveries Made Possible by Tina Peters Read More »

Coordinated Use of Standing Dismissals, Rule 11 Sanctions Threats, and Attorney Discipline to Deter Election Integrity Litigation (MI)

Disputed Fact, Judicial Malfeasance, Lawfare, Michigan, United States /

Disputed Fact Multiple attorneys who filed election integrity challenges in Michigan faced concurrent financial and professional consequences initiated or recommended by federal and state officials. In August 2021, U.S. District Judge Linda V. Parker sanctioned Sidney Powell, Lin Wood, Stefanie Lambert, and six other attorneys for the King v. Whitmer challenge, ordering monetary payment of

Coordinated Use of Standing Dismissals, Rule 11 Sanctions Threats, and Attorney Discipline to Deter Election Integrity Litigation (MI) Read More »

Prolific Use of Standing Dismissals, Rule 11 Sanctions Threats, and Attorney Discipline to Deter Election Integrity Litigation (MI)

Established Fact, Judicial Malfeasance, Lawfare, Michigan, United States /

Established Fact [Established Fact – As to procedural dismissal rates, Clare Locke letters, anti-analysis clause, and Bailey dismissal basis] The Michigan source record, corroborated by the national elections litigation analysis in the project files, establishes that the characterization of all Michigan post-2020 election cases as having been dismissed “for lack of evidence” is factually inaccurate.

Prolific Use of Standing Dismissals, Rule 11 Sanctions Threats, and Attorney Discipline to Deter Election Integrity Litigation (MI) Read More »

OSC Legislative Investigation Subjected to Three Simultaneous Dane County Lawsuits – Judicial Resources as Obstruction Tool (WI)

Judicial Malfeasance, Lawfare, Reasonable Inference, United States, Wisconsin /

Reasonable Inference [Reasonable Inference – Resource drain on investigative function was the practical effect] The Wisconsin Legislature’s Office of the Special Counsel (OSC) under Special Counsel Michael Gableman faced three separate, simultaneous lawsuits filed against it in Dane County Circuit Court – a Democratic-leaning jurisdiction. These actions forced the OSC to expend significant investigative resources

OSC Legislative Investigation Subjected to Three Simultaneous Dane County Lawsuits – Judicial Resources as Obstruction Tool (WI) Read More »

OSC Legislative Investigation Subjected to Three Simultaneous Dane County Lawsuits (WI)

Established Fact, Judicial Malfeasance, Lawfare, United States, Wisconsin /

Established Fact [Established Fact – Three suits filed] The Wisconsin Legislature’s Office of the Special Counsel (OSC) under Special Counsel Michael Gableman faced three separate, simultaneous lawsuits filed against it in Dane County Circuit Court – a Democratic-leaning jurisdiction. These actions forced the OSC to expend significant investigative resources in defensive litigation rather than investigation.

OSC Legislative Investigation Subjected to Three Simultaneous Dane County Lawsuits (WI) Read More »

Coordinated lawfare strategy against DOGE staff (US)

Judicial Malfeasance, Lawfare, Reasonable Inference, United States /

Reasonable Inference Democratic-aligned groups and Democratic officials are actively using investigations and lawsuits to challenge DOGE’s legality, activity, and personnel in an attempt to prevent discovery of illicit transactions pertaining to NGO’s engaged in questionable election practices. Multiple lawsuits have been filed against DOGE by progressive or Democratic‑aligned organizations (e.g., CREW, Democracy Forward, unions, public‑interest

Coordinated lawfare strategy against DOGE staff (US) Read More »