Electronic Voting System Integrity

Unapproved Hardware Substitution – Tabulators Identified as ICE Devices Despite ICP2 Representation; Procurement Records Corroborate Substitution (AZ)

Reasonable Inference Maricopa County publicly represented its 2020 tabulator deployment as consisting of ImageCast Precinct 2 (ICP2) optical scan units. However, multiple independent forensic indicators establish that the devices operated on Election Day were ImageCast Evolution (ICE) units: EMS configuration files consistently identified the tabulators as ICE devices, not ICP2 units; SLOG verification logs and

Unapproved Hardware Substitution – Tabulators Identified as ICE Devices Despite ICP2 Representation; Procurement Records Corroborate Substitution (AZ) Read More »

Surreptitious Software Alteration – Tabulation Components Deviated from Certified Build; L&A Testing Conducted on Only Five Spare Tabulators (AZ)

Disputed Fact System log files reviewed during post-election forensic analysis indicate that Maricopa County’s tabulation software was surreptitiously altered in components that control how ballots are read – the core functional module of any optical scan tabulator. This alteration rendered the deployed software an uncertified build not matching the EAC-approved Dominion Democracy Suite 5.5B golden

Surreptitious Software Alteration – Tabulation Components Deviated from Certified Build; L&A Testing Conducted on Only Five Spare Tabulators (AZ) Read More »

Unauthorized Dual-Boot Configuration on Adjudication Endpoint (AZ)

Established Fact Forensic review of Maricopa County’s election network discovered a dual-boot configuration on the “Adjudication 02” endpoint workstation. The system contained two internal hard drives, both capable of booting to different operating environments. The second drive contained non-county, non-election data whose provenance has not been publicly disclosed. A certified election system is required to

Unauthorized Dual-Boot Configuration on Adjudication Endpoint (AZ) Read More »

ESS Tabulators with 4G Modems – Certified Machines Bypassing Isolation Requirements (WI)

Established Fact The Gableman Special Counsel Report documented that ESS voting tabulators deployed throughout Wisconsin, despite holding federal and state certification, were manufactured and deployed with embedded 4G wireless modems enabling internet connectivity. In Green Bay, these certified machines connected to a hidden Wi-Fi access point at the Grand Hyatt hotel – the central count

ESS Tabulators with 4G Modems – Certified Machines Bypassing Isolation Requirements (WI) Read More »

Dominion EMS Configured with 68.05% Error Rate – Forcing Mass Adjudication – System Suppressed Critical Error Messages During Vote Shifting (MI)

Disputed Fact Forensic analysis by the Allied Security Operations Group (ASOG), conducted pursuant to a court-authorized inspection in Bailey v. Antrim County, documented that the Dominion EMS was intentionally configured to generate a tabulation error rate of 68.05% – meaning more than two-thirds of all ballots processed were flagged for manual adjudication. The VVSG Section

Dominion EMS Configured with 68.05% Error Rate – Forcing Mass Adjudication – System Suppressed Critical Error Messages During Vote Shifting (MI) Read More »

68.05% Ballot Error Rate – Dominion EMS Configuration Altered Pre-Election to Force Mass Adjudication (MI)

Established Fact The ASOG forensic report further documented that the Antrim County Dominion EMS was erroneously configured to produce a 68.05% ballot error rate – meaning more than two-thirds of all ballots were rejected by the machine and routed to human adjudication. The national standard for acceptable ballot error rates is less than 0.0008%. A

68.05% Ballot Error Rate – Dominion EMS Configuration Altered Pre-Election to Force Mass Adjudication (MI) Read More »

Secretary of Commonwealth Decertified Fulton County Voting Machines in Retaliation for Commissioning Independent Forensic Audit (PA)

Established Fact After Fulton County, Pennsylvania commissioned an independent forensic examination of its Dominion voting equipment – an audit it was authorized to conduct under Pennsylvania law – the Pennsylvania Secretary of the Commonwealth decertified Fulton County’s voting machines on the stated basis that the county had permitted an independent inspector to access them. Fulton

Secretary of Commonwealth Decertified Fulton County Voting Machines in Retaliation for Commissioning Independent Forensic Audit (PA) Read More »

EAC Certification Does Not Require Disclosure of Foreign Ownership, Supply Chain Provenance, or Remote Access Capabilities (US)

Established Fact The EAC’s certification program, as documented by the Brennan Center’s November 2019 report, certifies voting systems against technical performance standards but does not require vendors to disclose: foreign connections or ownership structures; supply chain provenance of components; or embedded remote-access capabilities. This structural gap enabled ESS and Dominion to pass through the federal

EAC Certification Does Not Require Disclosure of Foreign Ownership, Supply Chain Provenance, or Remote Access Capabilities (US) Read More »

EAC’s Own Investigation Found Tabulation Discrepancies in 7 of 18 Dominion ICP Tabulators (TN)

Established Fact The EAC’s own investigation of Dominion Democracy Suite 5.5-B deployment in Williamson County, Tennessee documented anomalies in which close poll reports from 7 of 18 ICP tabulators did not match the number of ballots scanned – requiring correction through central count scanner re-tabulation. This is not a finding by election integrity advocates; it

EAC’s Own Investigation Found Tabulation Discrepancies in 7 of 18 Dominion ICP Tabulators (TN) Read More »

Retaliatory Decertification – State Punishes County for Exercising Audit Rights (PA)

Disputed Fact The Pennsylvania Secretary of the Commonwealth’s decertification of Fulton County’s Dominion machines, triggered solely by Fulton County’s exercise of its audit rights, effectively inverted the relationship between state oversight and local accountability. Under Pennsylvania election law, counties retain statutory authority to verify the integrity of election equipment under their custody. If the state

Retaliatory Decertification – State Punishes County for Exercising Audit Rights (PA) Read More »