Reasonable Inference Poll worker overseeing Precinct 374 in Detroit provided affidavit that the tabulator printouts indicated write-in votes but none of the ballots that he saw featured write-in votes. This could indicate that the ICP was programmed to flag certain ballots (perhaps Trump votes) as “write-in” so that the ballots would be diverted to the […]
Detroit Write-In Precinct Tape Discrepancy (MI) Read More »
Reasonable Inference [Reasonable Inference – As to physical ballot location pending forensic verification] The Wisconsin Office of the Special Counsel (OSC) documented that Command Central, LLC – a Dominion Voting Systems reseller and servicer – received images of cast ballots on election night via internet connection and is alleged to be holding actual physical cast
Reasonable Inference [Established Fact – Dominion operational control confirmed; FIPS violation confirmed; EAC certification timing confirmed] The EOG Report concluded that Dominion Voting Systems personnel were in operational control of voting systems in nearly every Georgia county during the election period. This determination is critical to the record destruction findings: the personnel with the greatest
Reasonable Inference Content summarizing or linking to the findings of Special Counsel Michael Gableman’s legislative investigation into Wisconsin’s 2020 election – including documented findings regarding CTCL-embedded private operatives and WisVote database access – was targeted for labeling by EIP-affiliated monitoring systems under the “election integrity delegitimization” category. This suppression of a formal, legislature-commissioned investigative report
Suppression of Gableman Investigation Reporting and OSC Findings (WI) Read More »
Reasonable Inference [Reasonable Inference – As to § 1519 applicability, pending determination of whether CISA officials knew of pending investigation when scrubbing occurred] Following the initiation of congressional oversight proceedings and the filing of Missouri v. Biden litigation, CISA deleted references to its domestic speech-monitoring and censorship-coordination activities from its public-facing website. The specific content
Reasonable Inference [Reasonable Inference – Causal effect on congressional awareness] The Georgia Senate Subcommittee on Elections, chaired by Senator William Ligon, issued a formal report on December 17, 2020 – three weeks before the joint session of Congress – concluding that the election was “so compromised by systemic irregularities and voter fraud that it should
Reasonable Inference In February 2023, attorney John Thaler and his investigator Jacqueline Breger presented allegations before the Arizona Legislature’s joint House and Senate Elections Committees claiming that the Sinaloa Cartel had laundered drug proceeds through Arizona real estate transactions and used bribed public officials — including the Governor, county supervisors, and Superior Court judges —
Cartel Election Influence (US) Read More »
Reasonable Inference In February 2023, attorney John Thaler and his investigator Jacqueline Breger presented allegations before the Arizona Legislature’s joint House and Senate Elections Committees claiming that the Sinaloa Cartel had laundered drug proceeds through Arizona real estate transactions and used bribed public officials — including the Governor, county supervisors, and Superior Court judges —
Sinaloa Cartel Election Influence (AZ) Read More »
Reasonable Inference [Reasonable Inference – Exploitation uninvestigated] Investigators identified a documented security vulnerability in Wisconsin’s MyVote WI public-facing voter registration portal that created the capability for anyone obtaining remote access to the voter rolls to change voter information – including voting history – without the change being detected or logged in any auditable way. MyVote
Reasonable Inference [Reasonable Inference – Intentionality unresolved] The U.S. Capitol Police Intelligence and Interagency Coordination Division (IICD) possessed specific intelligence about plans to target the Capitol on January 6 but failed to incorporate that intelligence into formal security assessments – rating the likelihood of civil disobedience as “Remote” or “Improbable” in reports issued January 4-6,
