“In Arizona: 263,139 corrupt ballot images and 21,273 missing — tally unverifiable. In Georgia: 17,852 certified votes with no ballot image — confirmed by two professors. In Colorado: mid-election database creation changing adjudication counts by the hundreds. In Michigan: logs deleted, configurations set to 68,000 times the legal error rate. In every state, the digital
Voter Tally Integrity Analysis Read More »
“In Georgia: 22,534 more ballots counted than voters credited — in an election decided by 12,670. In Michigan: 499,850 voter participation records removed from the database years after the election. In Arizona: poll book controls disabling double-vote detection mid-Election Day. Voter history is the foundational record that links a ballot to a human being. In
Voter History Integrity Analysis Read More »
“‘Just look at the ballots’ is a great answer — right up until somebody tries.” The standard reassurance after any contested election is some version of “the paper is the ground truth — just look at the ballots.” The record on Ballot Integrity across Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin describes what happens when someone
Ballot Integrity Analysis Read More »
“‘Every debate about 2020 focuses on ballots — who cast them, how they were counted, where they ended up. But the ballot starts with the roll. If the roll contains people who don’t exist, have moved, are not citizens, or are registered twice — the ballot problem is already baked in before a single vote
Voter Roll Integrity Analysis Read More »
The Foreign Interference findings show that in 2020 the United States conducted a presidential election using critical infrastructure whose hardware, software, data flows, and information environment were all measurably exposed to adversarial foreign jurisdictions and operations, while the intelligence system responsible for detecting and deterring that interference was itself politicized and partially blinded. Taken together,
Foreign Interference Read More »
Across all four Weaponization of Government subtopics—Obstruction, Intimidation, Willful Neglect of Duty, and Malicious Prosecution—the findings show a coherent pattern: state and federal power was repeatedly used to block election scrutiny, chill oversight, and punish those who challenged 2020 processes, while leaving clear statutory violations by officials and vendors largely unaddressed. From a national security
Weaponization of Government Analysis Read More »
Across the Seditious Conspiracy pre‑election, Election Day, and post‑election phases, the findings depict a single, multi‑stage operational network that deliberately positioned itself to control both the administration of the 2020 election and the constitutional processes for contesting and certifying its outcome, using a blend of pre‑planned mobilization, insider access, and information dominance that rises to
Seditious Conspiracy Analysis Read More »
Across all three Privatized Election Operations subtopics—illusory contracts, privileged access, and operational control—the findings show that core election functions in 2020 were effectively outsourced to private vendors and NGOs whose actions and records largely fell outside traditional public‑law constraints, transparency, and security vetting. Collectively, these findings depict a shadow governance layer over U.S. elections: private,
Privatized Election Operations Analysis Read More »
Across all four Financial Influence subtopics—campaign finance, NGO funding, cartel funding, and election‑operations bias—the report concludes that concentrated, opaque, and often ideologically aligned money flows did not merely support political speech but directly reshaped election administration and created exploitable channels for hostile or criminal actors. Collectively, these findings depict a financialized control layer sitting on
Financial Influence Analysis Read More »
Across all three Information Control subtopics—misinformation policy, censorship, and influence operations—the report finds that government‑anchored networks systematically managed domestic election‑related speech in 2020, suppressing or marginalizing evidence‑based criticism of election administration while amplifying official narratives and doing so through structures originally justified as defenses against foreign disinformation. Collectively, these findings depict an information‑control architecture that
Information Control Analysis Read More »
