Judicial Malfeasance

Wood v. Raffensperger, No. 1:20-cv-04651-SDG (N.D. Ga.), aff’d 11th Cir. – Standing and Laches; Affirmed as Moot Post-Certification (GA)

Case Dismissal, Established Fact, Georgia, Judicial Malfeasance, United States /

Established Fact A lawsuit challenging absentee ballot signature verification procedures and seeking to prohibit certification was dismissed by the District Court for lack of standing and laches, then affirmed by the Eleventh Circuit on the additional ground that the case had become moot once results were certified. The plaintiffs alleged that Georgia’s failure to enforce […]

Wood v. Raffensperger, No. 1:20-cv-04651-SDG (N.D. Ga.), aff’d 11th Cir. – Standing and Laches; Affirmed as Moot Post-Certification (GA) Read More »

DoJ Lawsuits To Obtain State Election Records Required to Determine HAVA and NVRA Compliance Dismissed (US)

Case Dismissal, Established Fact, Judicial Malfeasance, United States /

Established Fact Courts have dismissed DoJ lawsuits demanding access to records needed to verify HAVA and NVRA compliance. Michigan, Georgia, Oregon and California cases were dismissed. Other suits are pending. These lawsuits cite HAVA and the NVRA as legal authority, but federal courts have so far rejected the argument that either statute compels states to

DoJ Lawsuits To Obtain State Election Records Required to Determine HAVA and NVRA Compliance Dismissed (US) Read More »

Systemic Speed of Post-Election Dismissals Precluded Forensic Evidence Presentation – Statewide (AZ)

Arizona, Case Dismissal, Established Fact, Judicial Malfeasance, United States /

Established Fact [Established Fact – Timing of dismissals vs. completion of audits] Multiple Arizona post-election challenges were dismissed in December 2020 – within weeks of election certification – on standing, mootness, or procedural grounds. The Cyber Ninjas audit was not completed until September 2021, and forensic analyses by Ben Cotton (CyFIR) and Jovan Pulitzer were

Systemic Speed of Post-Election Dismissals Precluded Forensic Evidence Presentation – Statewide (AZ) Read More »

Ward v. Jackson, No. CV2020-015285 (Ariz. S. Ct.) – Decision Rested on Proven Falsehood (AZ)

Arizona, Case Dismissal, Judicial Malfeasance, Reasonable Inference, United States /

Reasonable Inference [Reasonable Inference – Court decision rested on incorrect factual predicate] In Ward v. Jackson, No. CV-20-0343-AP/EL (Ariz. Dec. 8, 2020), the Arizona Supreme Court rejected a challenge to the 2020 presidential election results in which the central dispute concerned the accuracy of ballot duplication — a process in which damaged or defective ballots

Ward v. Jackson, No. CV2020-015285 (Ariz. S. Ct.) – Decision Rested on Proven Falsehood (AZ) Read More »

Ward v. Jackson, No. CV2020-015285 (Ariz. S. Ct.) – Comingling & Representations by Government Counsel That Contradict Physical Record (AZ)

Arizona, Case Dismissal, Established Fact, Judicial Malfeasance, United States /

Established Fact [Established Fact – Representation was made; commingling was documented post-litigation] The Arizona Supreme Court adjudicated a challenge to the 2020 election results in which the Secretary of State’s counsel represented that original and duplicate ballots “are, by statute, segregated and preserved.” The Cyber Ninjas audit subsequently established that ballot boxes delivered for audit

Ward v. Jackson, No. CV2020-015285 (Ariz. S. Ct.) – Comingling & Representations by Government Counsel That Contradict Physical Record (AZ) Read More »

Bowyer v. Ducey, No. 2:20-cv-02321-DJH (D. Ariz.) – Dismissed for Standing; Claims Mischaracterized as Evidence Failure (AZ)

Arizona, Case Dismissal, Judicial Malfeasance, Reasonable Inference, United States /

Reasonable Interference [Reasonable Inference – Characterization as evidence dismissal is misleading] A federal lawsuit alleging large-scale election fraud and seeking to decertify Arizona’s election results was dismissed for lack of legal standing. The presiding judge described the claims as “sorely wanting of relevant or reliable evidence” and noted entertaining the suit “would cause extreme and

Bowyer v. Ducey, No. 2:20-cv-02321-DJH (D. Ariz.) – Dismissed for Standing; Claims Mischaracterized as Evidence Failure (AZ) Read More »

Financial Audit Needed in Trump v. Biden – Wisconsin Supreme Court 4-3 Dismissal on Laches of Claims re: “Democracy in the Park,” Indefinitely Confined Voters, and Altered Certification Envelopes (WI)

Bribery, Judicial Malfeasance, Reasonable Inference, United States, Wisconsin /

Reasonable Inference [Reasonable Inference – As to financial audit need] In Trump v. Biden (Wis. Sup. Ct. 2020), the Wisconsin Supreme Court dismissed three of four election challenge claims under the doctrine of laches in a 4-3 decision. The dismissed claims included challenges to (1) the WEC’s absentee ballot distribution in “Democracy in the Park”

Financial Audit Needed in Trump v. Biden – Wisconsin Supreme Court 4-3 Dismissal on Laches of Claims re: “Democracy in the Park,” Indefinitely Confined Voters, and Altered Certification Envelopes (WI) Read More »

Trump v. Biden – Wisconsin Supreme Court 4-3 Dismissal on Laches of Claims re: “Democracy in the Park,” Indefinitely Confined Voters, and Altered Certification Envelopes (WI)

Bribery, Established Fact, Judicial Malfeasance, United States, Wisconsin /

Established Fact [Established Fact – As to 4-3 ruling and dismissal basis] In Trump v. Biden (Wis. Sup. Ct. 2020), the Wisconsin Supreme Court dismissed three of four election challenge claims under the doctrine of laches in a 4-3 decision. The dismissed claims included challenges to (1) the WEC’s absentee ballot distribution in “Democracy in

Trump v. Biden – Wisconsin Supreme Court 4-3 Dismissal on Laches of Claims re: “Democracy in the Park,” Indefinitely Confined Voters, and Altered Certification Envelopes (WI) Read More »

Quid Pro Quo CEIR-Linked Private Funding of Legal Defense for Subpoenaed Election Officials (WI)

Bribery, Brown County, Dane County, Judicial Malfeasance, Milwaukee County, Racine County, Reasonable Inference, United States, Wisconsin /

Reasonable Inference [Reasonable Inference – As to ethics violation and quid pro quo structure] The Wisconsin Office of the Special Counsel (OSC), led by former Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice Michael Gableman, documented in its Second Interim Investigative Report that the Election Officials Legal Defense Network (EOLDN) – an organization linked through funding networks to the

Quid Pro Quo CEIR-Linked Private Funding of Legal Defense for Subpoenaed Election Officials (WI) Read More »

Election Officials Legal Defense Network (EOLDN) – CEIR-Linked Private Funding of Legal Defense for Subpoenaed Election Officials; Providing “Anything of Value” to Procure Non-Compliance With Legislative Oversight (WI)

Bribery, Brown County, Dane County, Established Fact, Judicial Malfeasance, Milwaukee County, Racine County, United States, Wisconsin /

Established Fact [Established Fact – As to EOLDN existence and free counsel provision] The Wisconsin Office of the Special Counsel (OSC), led by former Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice Michael Gableman, documented in its Second Interim Investigative Report that the Election Officials Legal Defense Network (EOLDN) – an organization linked through funding networks to the Center

Election Officials Legal Defense Network (EOLDN) – CEIR-Linked Private Funding of Legal Defense for Subpoenaed Election Officials; Providing “Anything of Value” to Procure Non-Compliance With Legislative Oversight (WI) Read More »