Judicial Malfeasance

22 of 30 Cases Decided Upon Merit Favored Plaintiff Arguments (US)

Case Dismissal, Disputed Fact, Judicial Malfeasance, United States /

Disputed Fact [Disputed Fact – 22/30 favorable to plaintiffs figure requires independent verification] Of 64 major post-2020 election cases analyzed, 20 (31%) were dismissed on procedural grounds – predominantly standing. An additional 14 (22%) were voluntarily withdrawn, many under threat of Rule 11 sanctions. Only 30 (47%) proceeded to what was characterized as a merits […]

22 of 30 Cases Decided Upon Merit Favored Plaintiff Arguments (US) Read More »

31% of 64 Election Cases Dismissed on Standing – Not on Merits; “No Evidence” Public Narrative Is Materially Inaccurate (US)

Case Dismissal, Established Fact, Featured, Judicial Malfeasance, United States /

Established Fact [Established Fact – Procedural dismissal percentages from case analysis] Of 64 major post-2020 election cases analyzed, 20 (31%) were dismissed on procedural grounds – predominantly standing. An additional 14 (22%) were voluntarily withdrawn, many under threat of Rule 11 sanctions. Only 30 (47%) proceeded to what was characterized as a merits decision. Source

31% of 64 Election Cases Dismissed on Standing – Not on Merits; “No Evidence” Public Narrative Is Materially Inaccurate (US) Read More »

Justice Rebecca Bradley’s Teigen Concurrence – Judicial Acknowledgment That “Equity” Override of Statute Immunized Unlawful Election Administration (WI)

Case Dismissal, Established Fact, Judicial Malfeasance, United States, Wisconsin /

Established Fact In Teigen v. Wisconsin Elections Commission, Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice Rebecca Grassl Bradley wrote separately to note that the Wisconsin Supreme Court’s 2020 Trump v. Biden decision had allowed “equity” concerns – specifically, the disruption that post-election relief would cause – to override mandatory statutory requirements. This is a finding by a sitting

Justice Rebecca Bradley’s Teigen Concurrence – Judicial Acknowledgment That “Equity” Override of Statute Immunized Unlawful Election Administration (WI) Read More »

Trump v. Biden, No. 2020AP2038 (Wis. S. Ct.) – 4-3 Decision Dismissing Three of Four Claims on Laches; Drop Boxes Subsequently Ruled Illegal (WI)

Case Dismissal, Established Fact, Judicial Malfeasance, United States, Wisconsin /

Established Fact The Wisconsin Supreme Court, in a 4-3 decision, dismissed three of four claims in the Trump post-recount challenge under the doctrine of laches, ruling the campaign’s delay in bringing the challenges was “unreasonable in the extreme.” The challenged conduct included the WEC’s drop-box authorization, altered certification envelopes, and “Democracy in the Park” pre-canvassing

Trump v. Biden, No. 2020AP2038 (Wis. S. Ct.) – 4-3 Decision Dismissing Three of Four Claims on Laches; Drop Boxes Subsequently Ruled Illegal (WI) Read More »

Kelly v. Commonwealth, No. 620 MD 2020 (Pa. S. Ct.) – Act 77 Challenge Dismissed on Laches Despite Meritorious Constitutional Question (PA)

Case Dismissal, Established Fact, Judicial Malfeasance, Pennsylvania, United States /

Established Fact The Pennsylvania Supreme Court dismissed with prejudice a challenge to the constitutionality of Act 77 (which authorized universal no-excuse mail-in voting) on the doctrine of laches, ruling that petitioners had waited over a year after the law’s enactment, and until after the election, to file their facial constitutional challenge. However, Pennsylvania courts had

Kelly v. Commonwealth, No. 620 MD 2020 (Pa. S. Ct.) – Act 77 Challenge Dismissed on Laches Despite Meritorious Constitutional Question (PA) Read More »

Costantino v. Detroit, No. 20-014780-AW (Wayne Co. Cir. Ct.) – Dismissal Without Admission of TCF Center Internet Connectivity Evidence

Case Dismissal, Established Fact, Judicial Malfeasance, Michigan, United States /

Established Fact [Established Fact – Evidence was excluded and witnesses not permitted] A Michigan circuit court dismissed election challenges related to Detroit ballot-counting procedures at the TCF Center – including systemic exclusion of Republican poll challengers – without permitting the factual record to be developed through discovery. Judge Timothy Kenny specifically declined to admit evidence

Costantino v. Detroit, No. 20-014780-AW (Wayne Co. Cir. Ct.) – Dismissal Without Admission of TCF Center Internet Connectivity Evidence Read More »

Costantino v. Detroit, No. 20-014780-AW (Wayne Co. Cir. Ct.) – Dismissal – Court Basis for Dismissal Disputed (MI)

Case Dismissal, Disputed Fact, Judicial Malfeasance, Michigan, United States /

Disputed Fact [Disputed Fact – As to court’s factual conclusion] A Michigan circuit court dismissed election challenges related to Detroit ballot-counting procedures at the TCF Center – including systemic exclusion of Republican poll challengers – without permitting the factual record to be developed through discovery. Judge Timothy Kenny specifically declined to admit evidence from certified

Costantino v. Detroit, No. 20-014780-AW (Wayne Co. Cir. Ct.) – Dismissal – Court Basis for Dismissal Disputed (MI) Read More »

King v. Whitmer, No. 20-13134 (E.D. Mich.) – Dismissed on Five Compounded Procedural Grounds; “Speculation and Conjecture” Language Absent Discovery (MI)

Case Dismissal, Established Fact, Judicial Malfeasance, Michigan, United States /

Established Fact A federal lawsuit seeking to decertify Michigan’s election based on widespread fraud allegations and Dominion machine vulnerabilities was dismissed on five simultaneous procedural grounds: Eleventh Amendment immunity, laches, lack of standing, mootness, and abstention doctrines. The judge additionally characterized the claims as based on “nothing but speculation and conjecture” – language subsequently cited

King v. Whitmer, No. 20-13134 (E.D. Mich.) – Dismissed on Five Compounded Procedural Grounds; “Speculation and Conjecture” Language Absent Discovery (MI) Read More »

System Rigged Against Election Fraud Claims – Circular “Ripeness / Mootness” Trap – Pre-Election Claims Premature; Post-Certification Claims Moot (GA)

Case Dismissal, Georgia, Judicial Malfeasance, Reasonable Inference, United States /

Reasonable Inference [Reasonable Inference – Pattern was structurally self-reinforcing] Georgia courts dismissed pre-election challenges to expanded absentee and drop-box procedures as “not yet ripe” because the challenged election had not yet occurred. After the election, courts dismissed the same or analogous challenges on mootness grounds because certification had occurred. This bidirectional procedural barrier – deployed

System Rigged Against Election Fraud Claims – Circular “Ripeness / Mootness” Trap – Pre-Election Claims Premature; Post-Certification Claims Moot (GA) Read More »

Circular “Ripeness / Mootness” Trap – Pre-Election Claims Premature; Post-Certification Claims Moot (GA)

Case Dismissal, Established Fact, Georgia, Judicial Malfeasance, United States /

Established Fact [Established Fact – Dismissals before and after election on procedural grounds] Georgia courts dismissed pre-election challenges to expanded absentee and drop-box procedures as “not yet ripe” because the challenged election had not yet occurred. After the election, courts dismissed the same or analogous challenges on mootness grounds because certification had occurred. This bidirectional

Circular “Ripeness / Mootness” Trap – Pre-Election Claims Premature; Post-Certification Claims Moot (GA) Read More »