Bribery

Financial Audit Needed in Trump v. Biden – Wisconsin Supreme Court 4-3 Dismissal on Laches of Claims re: “Democracy in the Park,” Indefinitely Confined Voters, and Altered Certification Envelopes (WI)

Bribery, Judicial Malfeasance, Reasonable Inference, United States, Wisconsin /

Reasonable Inference [Reasonable Inference – As to financial audit need] In Trump v. Biden (Wis. Sup. Ct. 2020), the Wisconsin Supreme Court dismissed three of four election challenge claims under the doctrine of laches in a 4-3 decision. The dismissed claims included challenges to (1) the WEC’s absentee ballot distribution in “Democracy in the Park” […]

Financial Audit Needed in Trump v. Biden – Wisconsin Supreme Court 4-3 Dismissal on Laches of Claims re: “Democracy in the Park,” Indefinitely Confined Voters, and Altered Certification Envelopes (WI) Read More »

Trump v. Biden – Wisconsin Supreme Court 4-3 Dismissal on Laches of Claims re: “Democracy in the Park,” Indefinitely Confined Voters, and Altered Certification Envelopes (WI)

Bribery, Established Fact, Judicial Malfeasance, United States, Wisconsin /

Established Fact [Established Fact – As to 4-3 ruling and dismissal basis] In Trump v. Biden (Wis. Sup. Ct. 2020), the Wisconsin Supreme Court dismissed three of four election challenge claims under the doctrine of laches in a 4-3 decision. The dismissed claims included challenges to (1) the WEC’s absentee ballot distribution in “Democracy in

Trump v. Biden – Wisconsin Supreme Court 4-3 Dismissal on Laches of Claims re: “Democracy in the Park,” Indefinitely Confined Voters, and Altered Certification Envelopes (WI) Read More »

Quid Pro Quo CEIR-Linked Private Funding of Legal Defense for Subpoenaed Election Officials (WI)

Bribery, Brown County, Dane County, Judicial Malfeasance, Milwaukee County, Racine County, Reasonable Inference, United States, Wisconsin /

Reasonable Inference [Reasonable Inference – As to ethics violation and quid pro quo structure] The Wisconsin Office of the Special Counsel (OSC), led by former Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice Michael Gableman, documented in its Second Interim Investigative Report that the Election Officials Legal Defense Network (EOLDN) – an organization linked through funding networks to the

Quid Pro Quo CEIR-Linked Private Funding of Legal Defense for Subpoenaed Election Officials (WI) Read More »

Election Officials Legal Defense Network (EOLDN) – CEIR-Linked Private Funding of Legal Defense for Subpoenaed Election Officials; Providing “Anything of Value” to Procure Non-Compliance With Legislative Oversight (WI)

Bribery, Brown County, Dane County, Established Fact, Judicial Malfeasance, Milwaukee County, Racine County, United States, Wisconsin /

Established Fact [Established Fact – As to EOLDN existence and free counsel provision] The Wisconsin Office of the Special Counsel (OSC), led by former Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice Michael Gableman, documented in its Second Interim Investigative Report that the Election Officials Legal Defense Network (EOLDN) – an organization linked through funding networks to the Center

Election Officials Legal Defense Network (EOLDN) – CEIR-Linked Private Funding of Legal Defense for Subpoenaed Election Officials; Providing “Anything of Value” to Procure Non-Compliance With Legislative Oversight (WI) Read More »

Financial Incentives Behind Kelly v. Commonwealth – Pennsylvania Supreme Court Dismissal (PA)

Bribery, Judicial Malfeasance, Pennsylvania, Reasonable Inference, United States /

Reasonable Inference [Reasonable Inference – As to investigative need for financial relationship audit] In Kelly v. Commonwealth, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court dismissed a facial constitutional challenge to Act 77 of 2019 – the statute authorizing universal no-excuse mail-in voting – on the doctrine of laches, ruling that plaintiffs had waited too long after the law’s

Financial Incentives Behind Kelly v. Commonwealth – Pennsylvania Supreme Court Dismissal (PA) Read More »

Kelly v. Commonwealth – Pennsylvania Supreme Court Dismissed Mail-In Ballot Constitutional Challenge on Laches Without Addressing Act 77’s Constitutionality (PA)

Bribery, Established Fact, Judicial Malfeasance, Pennsylvania, United States /

Established Fact [Established Fact – As to dismissal and its legal effect] In Kelly v. Commonwealth, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court dismissed a facial constitutional challenge to Act 77 of 2019 – the statute authorizing universal no-excuse mail-in voting – on the doctrine of laches, ruling that plaintiffs had waited too long after the law’s passage

Kelly v. Commonwealth – Pennsylvania Supreme Court Dismissed Mail-In Ballot Constitutional Challenge on Laches Without Addressing Act 77’s Constitutionality (PA) Read More »

Private “Zuckerbucks” CTCL Funding Injected Into Specific Counties; Every Legal Challenge to Targeted Funding Dismissed – Judicial Shielded Bribery Scheme for Privately Financed Election Administration (PA)

Bribery, Disputed Fact, Judicial Malfeasance, Pennsylvania, United States /

Disputed Fact [Disputed Fact – As to characterization as judicially shielded bribery scheme] While direct bribery of a Pennsylvania judge is not explicitly documented in the source record, the investigative record establishes the following sequence: (1) millions of dollars in private CTCL grants were injected into specific Pennsylvania counties – including Philadelphia, Delaware, and Centre

Private “Zuckerbucks” CTCL Funding Injected Into Specific Counties; Every Legal Challenge to Targeted Funding Dismissed – Judicial Shielded Bribery Scheme for Privately Financed Election Administration (PA) Read More »

Private “Zuckerbucks” CTCL Funding Injected Into Specific Counties; Every Legal Challenge to Targeted Funding Dismissed (PA)

Bribery, Established Fact, Judicial Malfeasance, Pennsylvania, United States /

Established Fact [Established Fact – As to CTCL funding and judicial dismissals] While direct bribery of a Pennsylvania judge is not explicitly documented in the source record, the investigative record establishes the following sequence: (1) millions of dollars in private CTCL grants were injected into specific Pennsylvania counties – including Philadelphia, Delaware, and Centre Counties

Private “Zuckerbucks” CTCL Funding Injected Into Specific Counties; Every Legal Challenge to Targeted Funding Dismissed (PA) Read More »

MI SoS Jocelyn Benson Bribed MI Supreme Court Justice with Michigan Legacy PAC – $82,500 Contribution From Defendant Benson’s Political Apparatus to Justice Kyra Harris Bolden’s Campaign During Pendency of O’Halloran v. Benson (MI)

Bribery, Judicial Malfeasance, Michigan, Reasonable Inference, United States /

Reasonable Inference [Reasonable Inference – As to the constitutional impropriety under Caperton] Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson’s political fundraising entity, “Michigan Legacy PAC,” made a $82,500 contribution to the campaign of Michigan Supreme Court Justice Kyra Harris Bolden in April 2024. At the time the contribution was made, Secretary Benson was an active defendant

MI SoS Jocelyn Benson Bribed MI Supreme Court Justice with Michigan Legacy PAC – $82,500 Contribution From Defendant Benson’s Political Apparatus to Justice Kyra Harris Bolden’s Campaign During Pendency of O’Halloran v. Benson (MI) Read More »

Michigan Legacy PAC – $82,500 Contribution From Defendant Benson’s Political Apparatus to Justice Kyra Harris Bolden’s Campaign During Pendency of O’Halloran v. Benson (MI)

Bribery, Established Fact, Judicial Malfeasance, Michigan, United States /

Established Fact [Established Fact – As to the $82,500 contribution, the pending litigation, the August 2024 ruling, and the filing of grievances] Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson’s political fundraising entity, “Michigan Legacy PAC,” made a $82,500 contribution to the campaign of Michigan Supreme Court Justice Kyra Harris Bolden in April 2024. At the time

Michigan Legacy PAC – $82,500 Contribution From Defendant Benson’s Political Apparatus to Justice Kyra Harris Bolden’s Campaign During Pendency of O’Halloran v. Benson (MI) Read More »