Judicial Malfeasance

Financial Incentives Behind Kelly v. Commonwealth – Pennsylvania Supreme Court Dismissal (PA)

Reasonable Inference [Reasonable Inference – As to investigative need for financial relationship audit] In Kelly v. Commonwealth, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court dismissed a facial constitutional challenge to Act 77 of 2019 – the statute authorizing universal no-excuse mail-in voting – on the doctrine of laches, ruling that plaintiffs had waited too long after the law’s […]

Financial Incentives Behind Kelly v. Commonwealth – Pennsylvania Supreme Court Dismissal (PA) Read More »

Kelly v. Commonwealth – Pennsylvania Supreme Court Dismissed Mail-In Ballot Constitutional Challenge on Laches Without Addressing Act 77’s Constitutionality (PA)

Established Fact [Established Fact – As to dismissal and its legal effect] In Kelly v. Commonwealth, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court dismissed a facial constitutional challenge to Act 77 of 2019 – the statute authorizing universal no-excuse mail-in voting – on the doctrine of laches, ruling that plaintiffs had waited too long after the law’s passage

Kelly v. Commonwealth – Pennsylvania Supreme Court Dismissed Mail-In Ballot Constitutional Challenge on Laches Without Addressing Act 77’s Constitutionality (PA) Read More »

Private “Zuckerbucks” CTCL Funding Injected Into Specific Counties; Every Legal Challenge to Targeted Funding Dismissed – Judicial Shielded Bribery Scheme for Privately Financed Election Administration (PA)

Disputed Fact [Disputed Fact – As to characterization as judicially shielded bribery scheme] While direct bribery of a Pennsylvania judge is not explicitly documented in the source record, the investigative record establishes the following sequence: (1) millions of dollars in private CTCL grants were injected into specific Pennsylvania counties – including Philadelphia, Delaware, and Centre

Private “Zuckerbucks” CTCL Funding Injected Into Specific Counties; Every Legal Challenge to Targeted Funding Dismissed – Judicial Shielded Bribery Scheme for Privately Financed Election Administration (PA) Read More »

Private “Zuckerbucks” CTCL Funding Injected Into Specific Counties; Every Legal Challenge to Targeted Funding Dismissed (PA)

Established Fact [Established Fact – As to CTCL funding and judicial dismissals] While direct bribery of a Pennsylvania judge is not explicitly documented in the source record, the investigative record establishes the following sequence: (1) millions of dollars in private CTCL grants were injected into specific Pennsylvania counties – including Philadelphia, Delaware, and Centre Counties

Private “Zuckerbucks” CTCL Funding Injected Into Specific Counties; Every Legal Challenge to Targeted Funding Dismissed (PA) Read More »

MI SoS Jocelyn Benson Bribed MI Supreme Court Justice with Michigan Legacy PAC – $82,500 Contribution From Defendant Benson’s Political Apparatus to Justice Kyra Harris Bolden’s Campaign During Pendency of O’Halloran v. Benson (MI)

Reasonable Inference [Reasonable Inference – As to the constitutional impropriety under Caperton] Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson’s political fundraising entity, “Michigan Legacy PAC,” made a $82,500 contribution to the campaign of Michigan Supreme Court Justice Kyra Harris Bolden in April 2024. At the time the contribution was made, Secretary Benson was an active defendant

MI SoS Jocelyn Benson Bribed MI Supreme Court Justice with Michigan Legacy PAC – $82,500 Contribution From Defendant Benson’s Political Apparatus to Justice Kyra Harris Bolden’s Campaign During Pendency of O’Halloran v. Benson (MI) Read More »

Michigan Legacy PAC – $82,500 Contribution From Defendant Benson’s Political Apparatus to Justice Kyra Harris Bolden’s Campaign During Pendency of O’Halloran v. Benson (MI)

Established Fact [Established Fact – As to the $82,500 contribution, the pending litigation, the August 2024 ruling, and the filing of grievances] Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson’s political fundraising entity, “Michigan Legacy PAC,” made a $82,500 contribution to the campaign of Michigan Supreme Court Justice Kyra Harris Bolden in April 2024. At the time

Michigan Legacy PAC – $82,500 Contribution From Defendant Benson’s Political Apparatus to Justice Kyra Harris Bolden’s Campaign During Pendency of O’Halloran v. Benson (MI) Read More »

Misappropriation of Public Funds by DA Fani Willis and Special Prosecutor Nathan Wade (GA)

Reasonable Inference [Reasonable Inference – That appearance created non-neutral prosecutorial incentives] Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis, the officer of the court responsible for prosecuting individuals who challenged the 2020 election results in Georgia – including former President Trump and eighteen co-defendants – was found by Fulton County Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee to have

Misappropriation of Public Funds by DA Fani Willis and Special Prosecutor Nathan Wade (GA) Read More »

Prosecutorial Financial Conflict of Interest – DA Fani Willis and Special Prosecutor Nathan Wade; Judicial Finding of “Significant Appearance of Impropriety” (GA)

Established Fact Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis, who led the primary state-level prosecution of individuals challenging the 2020 Georgia election results, was found by Fulton County Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee to have maintained a personal romantic relationship with Special Prosecutor Nathan Wade — whom she hired and paid $653,881 from public prosecution funds.

Prosecutorial Financial Conflict of Interest – DA Fani Willis and Special Prosecutor Nathan Wade; Judicial Finding of “Significant Appearance of Impropriety” (GA) Read More »

Ward v. Jackson – Government Counsel’s Representation to Arizona Supreme Court That Ballots Were Segregated; Physical State of Ballot Corpus Inconsistent with Representation (AZ)

Reasonable Inference In Ward v. Jackson, Arizona Supreme Court Case No. CV2020-015285, the Secretary of State’s counsel represented to the court that the challenged ballots had been segregated and preserved in a manner that would permit the relief requested. The Cyber Ninjas audit, completed in September 2021, found that the physical ballot corpus was not

Ward v. Jackson – Government Counsel’s Representation to Arizona Supreme Court That Ballots Were Segregated; Physical State of Ballot Corpus Inconsistent with Representation (AZ) Read More »

Alleged RICO Bribery Network Among Maricopa County Superior Court Judges – Harris/Thaler Law Firm Criminal Investigation (AZ)

Reasonable Inference [Reasonable Inference aspect of this finding] An extensive investigation by the Harris/Thaler Law Firm, submitted as a formal brief in Maricopa County Superior Court criminal case CR2021-134056, alleged that public officials – including more than two dozen judges of the Maricopa County Superior Court – accepted bribes to protect racketeering enterprises and to

Alleged RICO Bribery Network Among Maricopa County Superior Court Judges – Harris/Thaler Law Firm Criminal Investigation (AZ) Read More »