Recount

Recount Confirmed Results Incorporating Votes Cast Under Subsequently Invalidated Drop-Box Guidance (WI)

Established Fact The Wisconsin Elections Commission issued administrative guidance memoranda in spring 2020 and on August 19, 2020, authorizing unstaffed ballot drop boxes as a permissible method of absentee ballot return. These memoranda were subsequently held by the Wisconsin Supreme Court in Teigen v. Wisconsin Elections Commission, 2022 WI 64, No. 2022AP91 (Wis. July 8, […]

Recount Confirmed Results Incorporating Votes Cast Under Subsequently Invalidated Drop-Box Guidance (WI) Read More »

440,781 “Unknown” Mail Ballots and 155,053 Voter Deficit – No Recount Could Resolve the Foundational Discrepancy (PA)

Established Fact The Public Interest Legal Foundation (PILF), analyzing EAC post-election survey data, documented that 440,781 Pennsylvania mail ballots were classified as “unknown” – meaning election officials had no record of what happened to them. This figure exceeded the certified presidential margin of victory (81,660) by a ratio of more than 5:1. Separately, Representative Francis

440,781 “Unknown” Mail Ballots and 155,053 Voter Deficit – No Recount Could Resolve the Foundational Discrepancy (PA) Read More »

Physical Destruction of Machine Tapes and V-Drives to Intentionally Prevent Recount Discrepancy Discovery (PA)

Reasonable Inference [Reasonable Inference – Timing and Ziegelhoffer’s statement are consistent with intentional destruction to prevent recount discrepancy detection] Named-witness testimony from a person present at a Delaware County election facility establishes that county officials – identified as Attorney Thomas Gallagher and James Ziegelhoffer – physically tore election data into pieces, with Ziegelhoffer stating the

Physical Destruction of Machine Tapes and V-Drives to Intentionally Prevent Recount Discrepancy Discovery (PA) Read More »

Physical Destruction of Machine Tapes and V-Drives to Prevent Recount Discrepancy Discovery (PA)

Disputed Fact [Disputed Fact – Named-witness testimony not yet adjudicated; Ziegelhoffer statement is powerful but requires corroboration and authentication] Named-witness testimony from a person present at a Delaware County election facility establishes that county officials – identified as Attorney Thomas Gallagher and James Ziegelhoffer – physically tore election data into pieces, with Ziegelhoffer stating the

Physical Destruction of Machine Tapes and V-Drives to Prevent Recount Discrepancy Discovery (PA) Read More »

Machine Recount of a Compromised Tabulator System – Vote Shift Algorithm Identified (MI)

Disputed Fact [Disputed Fact – Vote-shift algorithm characterization – supported by Lenberg analysis, contested by Secretary of State] Antrim County’s tabulation system – Dominion Voting Systems Democracy Suite 5.5 – was documented by the Allied Security Operations Group (ASOG) forensic report to have a 68.05% error rate in tabulator logs, grossly exceeding the maximum allowable

Machine Recount of a Compromised Tabulator System – Vote Shift Algorithm Identified (MI) Read More »

Machine Recount of a Compromised Tabulator System – 68.05% Error Rate (MI)

Established Fact [Established Fact – ASOG error rate, log anomalies, project file alteration, image deletion] Antrim County’s tabulation system – Dominion Voting Systems Democracy Suite 5.5 – was documented by the Allied Security Operations Group (ASOG) forensic report to have a 68.05% error rate in tabulator logs, grossly exceeding the maximum allowable 1-per-125,000 error rate

Machine Recount of a Compromised Tabulator System – 68.05% Error Rate (MI) Read More »

Statutory Loophole Exploited to Shield 71% of Detroit’s AVCB Precincts from Hand Recount (MI)

Reasonable Inference [Reasonable Inference – Characterization of the loophole as “exploited” rather than incidental requires further evidence of intent] Michigan law, MCL §168.871, provides that when a precinct is “out of balance” – meaning the number of voters credited in the poll book does not match the number of ballots counted – that precinct is

Statutory Loophole Exploited to Shield 71% of Detroit’s AVCB Precincts from Hand Recount (MI) Read More »

Statutory Loophole Shielded 71% of Detroit’s AVCB Precincts from Hand Recount (MI)

Established Fact [Established Fact – 71% imbalance rate, statutory mechanism, and recount disqualification are documented in official canvassing records] Michigan law, MCL §168.871, provides that when a precinct is “out of balance” – meaning the number of voters credited in the poll book does not match the number of ballots counted – that precinct is

Statutory Loophole Shielded 71% of Detroit’s AVCB Precincts from Hand Recount (MI) Read More »

Deceptive Hand-Count “Audit” Used as Recount Surrogate Contained 4.52% False Ballot Rate (GA)

Reasonable Inference [Reasonable Inference – Statewide extrapolation and concealment characterization require further evidentiary development] Georgia’s mandatory hand-count audit – conducted in lieu of a traditional recount as the first-tier verification mechanism – was subsequently documented by the Governor’s own SEB complaint (SEB2021-181) to contain a false-ballot rate of approximately 4.52% among absentee ballots audited. EOG

Deceptive Hand-Count “Audit” Used as Recount Surrogate Contained 4.52% False Ballot Rate (GA) Read More »

Hand-Count “Audit” Used as Recount Surrogate Contained 4.52% False Ballot Rate (GA)

Established Fact [Established Fact – False ballot rate, batch discrepancies, SEB referral] Georgia’s mandatory hand-count audit – conducted in lieu of a traditional recount as the first-tier verification mechanism – was subsequently documented by the Governor’s own SEB complaint (SEB2021-181) to contain a false-ballot rate of approximately 4.52% among absentee ballots audited. EOG calculated, by

Hand-Count “Audit” Used as Recount Surrogate Contained 4.52% False Ballot Rate (GA) Read More »