Election Results Certification Integrity

Spoliation of Evidence Prior to Senate Forensic Audit (AZ)

Established Fact The Maricopa County Recorder’s office deleted the entire 2020 General Election database from the Dominion EMS server and purged SQL logs the day before the Arizona Senate’s Cyber Ninjas forensic audit began, permanently eliminating native election-period system logs. When a backup was later restored, approximately 263,139 ballot images were corrupt and unreadable and […]

Spoliation of Evidence Prior to Senate Forensic Audit (AZ) Read More »

Recount Confirmed Results Incorporating Votes Cast Under Subsequently Invalidated Drop-Box Guidance (WI)

Established Fact The Wisconsin Elections Commission issued administrative guidance memoranda in spring 2020 and on August 19, 2020, authorizing unstaffed ballot drop boxes as a permissible method of absentee ballot return. These memoranda were subsequently held by the Wisconsin Supreme Court in Teigen v. Wisconsin Elections Commission, 2022 WI 64, No. 2022AP91 (Wis. July 8,

Recount Confirmed Results Incorporating Votes Cast Under Subsequently Invalidated Drop-Box Guidance (WI) Read More »

440,781 “Unknown” Mail Ballots and 155,053 Voter Deficit – No Recount Could Resolve the Foundational Discrepancy (PA)

Established Fact The Public Interest Legal Foundation (PILF), analyzing EAC post-election survey data, documented that 440,781 Pennsylvania mail ballots were classified as “unknown” – meaning election officials had no record of what happened to them. This figure exceeded the certified presidential margin of victory (81,660) by a ratio of more than 5:1. Separately, Representative Francis

440,781 “Unknown” Mail Ballots and 155,053 Voter Deficit – No Recount Could Resolve the Foundational Discrepancy (PA) Read More »

Physical Destruction of Machine Tapes and V-Drives to Intentionally Prevent Recount Discrepancy Discovery (PA)

Reasonable Inference [Reasonable Inference – Timing and Ziegelhoffer’s statement are consistent with intentional destruction to prevent recount discrepancy detection] Named-witness testimony from a person present at a Delaware County election facility establishes that county officials – identified as Attorney Thomas Gallagher and James Ziegelhoffer – physically tore election data into pieces, with Ziegelhoffer stating the

Physical Destruction of Machine Tapes and V-Drives to Intentionally Prevent Recount Discrepancy Discovery (PA) Read More »

Physical Destruction of Machine Tapes and V-Drives to Prevent Recount Discrepancy Discovery (PA)

Disputed Fact [Disputed Fact – Named-witness testimony not yet adjudicated; Ziegelhoffer statement is powerful but requires corroboration and authentication] Named-witness testimony from a person present at a Delaware County election facility establishes that county officials – identified as Attorney Thomas Gallagher and James Ziegelhoffer – physically tore election data into pieces, with Ziegelhoffer stating the

Physical Destruction of Machine Tapes and V-Drives to Prevent Recount Discrepancy Discovery (PA) Read More »

Machine Recount of a Compromised Tabulator System – Vote Shift Algorithm Identified (MI)

Disputed Fact [Disputed Fact – Vote-shift algorithm characterization – supported by Lenberg analysis, contested by Secretary of State] Antrim County’s tabulation system – Dominion Voting Systems Democracy Suite 5.5 – was documented by the Allied Security Operations Group (ASOG) forensic report to have a 68.05% error rate in tabulator logs, grossly exceeding the maximum allowable

Machine Recount of a Compromised Tabulator System – Vote Shift Algorithm Identified (MI) Read More »

Machine Recount of a Compromised Tabulator System – 68.05% Error Rate (MI)

Established Fact [Established Fact – ASOG error rate, log anomalies, project file alteration, image deletion] Antrim County’s tabulation system – Dominion Voting Systems Democracy Suite 5.5 – was documented by the Allied Security Operations Group (ASOG) forensic report to have a 68.05% error rate in tabulator logs, grossly exceeding the maximum allowable 1-per-125,000 error rate

Machine Recount of a Compromised Tabulator System – 68.05% Error Rate (MI) Read More »

Statutory Loophole Exploited to Shield 71% of Detroit’s AVCB Precincts from Hand Recount (MI)

Reasonable Inference [Reasonable Inference – Characterization of the loophole as “exploited” rather than incidental requires further evidence of intent] Michigan law, MCL §168.871, provides that when a precinct is “out of balance” – meaning the number of voters credited in the poll book does not match the number of ballots counted – that precinct is

Statutory Loophole Exploited to Shield 71% of Detroit’s AVCB Precincts from Hand Recount (MI) Read More »

Statutory Loophole Shielded 71% of Detroit’s AVCB Precincts from Hand Recount (MI)

Established Fact [Established Fact – 71% imbalance rate, statutory mechanism, and recount disqualification are documented in official canvassing records] Michigan law, MCL §168.871, provides that when a precinct is “out of balance” – meaning the number of voters credited in the poll book does not match the number of ballots counted – that precinct is

Statutory Loophole Shielded 71% of Detroit’s AVCB Precincts from Hand Recount (MI) Read More »

Deceptive Hand-Count “Audit” Used as Recount Surrogate Contained 4.52% False Ballot Rate (GA)

Reasonable Inference [Reasonable Inference – Statewide extrapolation and concealment characterization require further evidentiary development] Georgia’s mandatory hand-count audit – conducted in lieu of a traditional recount as the first-tier verification mechanism – was subsequently documented by the Governor’s own SEB complaint (SEB2021-181) to contain a false-ballot rate of approximately 4.52% among absentee ballots audited. EOG

Deceptive Hand-Count “Audit” Used as Recount Surrogate Contained 4.52% False Ballot Rate (GA) Read More »