Disputed Fact Delaware County’s responses to Right-to-Know Law requests were incomplete, contained covered notations, and provided data inconsistent with what county records showed at the time of certification – with the RTKL response crafted after officials began “conspiring to determine how to respond” knowing “massive election fraud” had occurred. Separately, Allegheny County denied a 2024
Established Fact U.S. Attorney McSwain publicly disclosed via letter dated June 9, 2021, that AG William Barr directed him to pass all election-fraud reports to Pennsylvania AG Josh Shapiro – rather than investigate them independently – despite Shapiro having publicly stated before the election that he would “fight like hell” to ensure Pennsylvania went for
AG Barr’s Direction to Route Fraud Referrals to Conflicted State AG (PA) Read More »
Disputed Fact A whistleblower provided corroborating video evidence alleging that Delaware County election officials shredded thousands of ballots in November 2021, in a deliberate effort to destroy election records and obstruct ongoing litigation and FOIA investigations. Named witnesses Regina Miller, Thomas Gallagher, and James Ziegelhoffer are alleged to have physically torn election data and stated
Physical Destruction of Election Records – Delaware County (PA) Read More »
Established Fact On January 4, 2021, plaintiffs Leah Hoopes, Gregory Stenstrom, and co-petitioners sent certified letters to the Delaware County DA (Jack Stollsteimer), Pennsylvania AG (Josh Shapiro), and U.S. Attorney for EDPA (William McSwain) documenting specific alleged election-law violations and requesting evidence preservation. As of November 2021, none had charged any individual or substantively responded
Attorney General/U.S. Attorney Failure to Respond to Election Fraud Referrals (PA) Read More »
Established Fact Forensic examination by Allied Security Operations Group (ASOG) confirmed that all adjudication log entries for the 2020 election cycle were entirely absent from the Antrim County EMS – while logs from prior years using identical software remained intact. The ASOG report concluded the records were “manually removed” in violation of state law. The
Antrim County Adjudication Log Deletion (MI) Read More »
Established Fact Interos mapped Machine A down to its third-tier suppliers and determined that 19.6% of the 140 identified components originate from China-based companies. Components sourced from Chinese firms enter the voting machine at every level of the supply chain — not merely at the periphery. This includes hardware for touchscreens ultimately packaged into the
20% of U.S. Election System Components Manufactured by Foreign Adversaries (China) Read More »
Reasonable Inference The ASOG Antrim Michigan Forensics Report (December 13, 2020) documented Dominion Voting Systems’ corporate structure: Dominion is Canadian-incorporated, owned by Staple Street Capital, which is in turn owned by UBS Securities LLC. Of UBS Securities’ seven board members, three are identified as Chinese nationals. Dominion’s software is licensed from Smartmatic – described as
Disputed Fact Scytl’s own marketing and bid documents for U.S. jurisdictions describe web‑based SaaS systems (ENR, eBallot Delivery, ePollBook, etc.) that are hosted in Scytl data centers or on cloud platforms (e.g., AWS) and accessed over the internet by election officials. Based on Scytl’s described services and contracts: Election Night Reporting: Scytl receives result files
Disputed Fact The Venezuelan National Electoral Council (CNE) owns the source code of Smartmatic’s core election software system (SAES) – a fact confirmed by the 2005 EU Electoral Observation Mission report and acknowledged by the Venezuelan government itself. A 2006 U.S. Embassy cable from Caracas assessed that “Smartmatic’s real ownership is hidden” and that the
Disputed Fact [Established Fact – Corporate structure and Huawei partnership] Corporate records confirm that Dominion Voting Systems began operations in Belgrade, Serbia in May 2011 and established its primary data center there through RoamingDot Networks, with Huawei Technologies as a strategic infrastructure partner. Huawei is explicitly prohibited under NDAA Section 889 from supplying components to
