Reasonable Inference Concerted efforts on behalf of MI officials to dismiss any concerns with the integrity of the 2020 election as “conspiracy theories”. Benson’s letter characterized the committee’s activities as allowing a witness to “spout false and baseless accusations against Michigan public servants — including more than 1,600 election clerks and tens of thousands of […]
Reasonable Inference [Reasonable Inference – Strategic convergence with EIP lists] The FBI opened “Operation Arctic Frost,” a multi-agency investigation into pro-Trump organizations and individuals, ultimately subpoenaing or interviewing scores of Republican entities and figures. A 2025 Senate oversight letter and a 2024 institutional-governance analysis both document that the set of groups targeted by Arctic Frost
FBI “Operation Arctic Frost” and Convergence with EIP Targeting (US) Read More »
Reasonable Inference [Reasonable Inference – Legal characterization] On October 14, 2020, the day the New York Post published the Hunter Biden laptop story, DHS/CISA recommended that the State Department’s Global Engagement Center (GEC) – an entity statutorily aimed at foreign propaganda – contact EIP and integrate its efforts into the 2020 “election misinformation” workflow. On
Illegal DHS/CISA-GEC-EIP Hunter Biden Laptop Narrative Coordination (US) Read More »
Reasonable Inference [Reasonable Inference – As to intent to operationalize] The Transition Integrity Project, a pre-election “war game” convening former officials and operatives, ran scenarios that explicitly contemplated using coordinated media narratives, orchestrated street protests, and elite pressure on state officials to secure a desired outcome if President Trump contested the results. The TIP report
Implementation of Transition Integrity Project (TIP) “Election Crisis” Actions (US) Read More »
Reasonable Inference [Reasonable Inference – As to partisan effect and FEC in-kind contribution theory] The EIP invited both the Democratic National Committee and the Republican National Committee to participate as “external stakeholders” in its Jira ticketing system – the mechanism through which suppression requests were submitted, routed, and tracked against platform action outcomes. The DNC
Reasonable Inference How the Attorney General’s own law-enforcement guidance treated poll challenger rights — the near-total 2020 silence on challenger rights, contrasted with the restriction-heavy challenger section of the 2024 guidance letter. The threshold fact: there was no 2020 AG challenger guidance Analyzing what the Attorney General told law enforcement about poll challengers in
Reasonable Inference [Reasonable Inference – As to obstruction theory] The Arizona source record documents that official state actors and media outlets characterized election integrity analyses – including findings from the Cyber Ninjas forensic audit, the Speckin forensic handwriting and ballot analysis, and the Pulitzer PKAD cybersecurity report – as “misinformation” or “disinformation” before any independent
Reasonable Inference [Reasonable Inference – Impact on congressional deliberation] The Pennsylvania State Legislature filed a formal resolution explicitly urging the U.S. Congress to declare Pennsylvania’s presidential electors “in dispute,” citing the executive branch’s unlawful infringement of the General Assembly’s constitutional authority. This was an official legislative act – yet major media organizations characterized the legislative
Reasonable Inference [Reasonable Inference – Chilling effect on investigative journalism and litigation] The U.S. Department of Homeland Security issued a Terrorism Advisory System Bulletin on February 7, 2022, explicitly classifying “false or misleading narratives regarding unsubstantiated widespread election fraud” as a “terrorism threat driver.” This bulletin was issued in the post-election period while litigation and
DHS February 2022 Terrorism Advisory – Chilling of Election Integrity Speech (US) Read More »
On October 28, 2020, Nadine Bloch with Feds for Democracy moderated a training session for federal workers called “Democracy Defense”. The session is a live Zoom meeting with an unspecified number of attendees — all identified as current federal government employees — less than one week before the 2020 election. The session features two primary speakers: Laura
Seditious Conspiracy by Federal Employees (US) Read More »
