Information Control

Hunter Biden Laptop Suppression by Intelligence Community and Platform Coordination (US)

Established Fact [Established Fact – Coordination] Fifty-one former senior intelligence officials signed a public letter on October 19, 2020, characterizing the Hunter Biden laptop story – published by the New York Post – as bearing “the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation.” The New York Post’s Twitter account was locked. Facebook reduced distribution of

Hunter Biden Laptop Suppression by Intelligence Community and Platform Coordination (US) Read More »

51 Former Intelligence Officials Published Intentionally False Statement Characterizing Authentic Hunter Biden Laptop as Russian Disinformation (US)

Disputed Fact [Disputed Fact – As to whether individual signatories knew the characterization was false at time of signing] Fifty-one former senior intelligence officials signed and published, in October 2020, a letter stating that the Hunter Biden laptop story bore “the hallmarks of Russian disinformation.” This letter was published ten days before the 2020 presidential

51 Former Intelligence Officials Published Intentionally False Statement Characterizing Authentic Hunter Biden Laptop as Russian Disinformation (US) Read More »

51 Former Intelligence Officials Published Statement Characterizing Authentic Hunter Biden Laptop as Russian Disinformation – Coordinated With Biden Campaign; IC IG Found Characterization False (US)

Established Fact [Established Fact – As to letter, campaign coordination per Morell’s Senate testimony, and IC IG authentication finding] Fifty-one former senior intelligence officials signed and published, in October 2020, a letter stating that the Hunter Biden laptop story bore “the hallmarks of Russian disinformation.” This letter was published ten days before the 2020 presidential

51 Former Intelligence Officials Published Statement Characterizing Authentic Hunter Biden Laptop as Russian Disinformation – Coordinated With Biden Campaign; IC IG Found Characterization False (US) Read More »

DNC Participated in EIP Jira Ticketing System; RNC Declined – Structural Partisan Asymmetry in Government-Sponsored Censorship Apparatus (US)

Reasonable Inference [Reasonable Inference – As to partisan effect and FEC in-kind contribution theory] The EIP invited both the Democratic National Committee and the Republican National Committee to participate as “external stakeholders” in its Jira ticketing system – the mechanism through which suppression requests were submitted, routed, and tracked against platform action outcomes. The DNC

DNC Participated in EIP Jira Ticketing System; RNC Declined – Structural Partisan Asymmetry in Government-Sponsored Censorship Apparatus (US) Read More »

DNC Participated in EIP Jira Ticketing System; RNC Declined (US)

Established Fact [Established Fact – As to DNC participation and RNC non-participation] The EIP invited both the Democratic National Committee and the Republican National Committee to participate as “external stakeholders” in its Jira ticketing system – the mechanism through which suppression requests were submitted, routed, and tracked against platform action outcomes. The DNC accepted and

DNC Participated in EIP Jira Ticketing System; RNC Declined (US) Read More »

WEC Chairperson Ann Jacobs Issued Public Statement Denying WEC Lawbreaking Despite Documented Felony Referrals by Racine County Sheriff – Official Misinformation by a State Actor (WI)

Established Fact Wisconsin Elections Commission Chairperson Ann Jacobs issued a public press release on October 28, 2021, affirmatively stating that no WEC member had broken the law in connection with the nursing home absentee voting directives that the WEC had issued in 2020. This statement was made with knowledge of, or reckless disregard for, the

WEC Chairperson Ann Jacobs Issued Public Statement Denying WEC Lawbreaking Despite Documented Felony Referrals by Racine County Sheriff – Official Misinformation by a State Actor (WI) Read More »

Secretary Boockvar’s Last-Minute Differential Ballot-Curing Guidance – Government-Authored Intentional Information Asymmetry in Election Administration (PA)

Disputed Fact [Disputed Fact – As to whether non-uniform application was intentional or logistical] Pennsylvania Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar issued guidance to select Pennsylvania counties on the evening of November 2, 2020 – the night before Election Day – encouraging certain counties to notify party representatives of defective mail-in ballot envelopes before Election Day.

Secretary Boockvar’s Last-Minute Differential Ballot-Curing Guidance – Government-Authored Intentional Information Asymmetry in Election Administration (PA) Read More »

Secretary Boockvar’s Last-Minute Differential Ballot-Curing Guidance – Government-Authored Information Asymmetry in Election Administration (PA)

Established Fact [Established Fact – As to guidance issuance and non-uniform application] Pennsylvania Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar issued guidance to select Pennsylvania counties on the evening of November 2, 2020 – the night before Election Day – encouraging certain counties to notify party representatives of defective mail-in ballot envelopes before Election Day. This guidance

Secretary Boockvar’s Last-Minute Differential Ballot-Curing Guidance – Government-Authored Information Asymmetry in Election Administration (PA) Read More »

MI AG Election Law Guidance to Law Enforcement Focused Upon Poll Challenger Restrictions to Exclusion of Poll Challenger Rights (MI)

Reasonable Inference How the Attorney General’s own law-enforcement guidance treated poll challenger rights — the near-total 2020 silence on challenger rights, contrasted with the restriction-heavy challenger section of the 2024 guidance letter.   The threshold fact: there was no 2020 AG challenger guidance Analyzing what the Attorney General told law enforcement about poll challengers in

MI AG Election Law Guidance to Law Enforcement Focused Upon Poll Challenger Restrictions to Exclusion of Poll Challenger Rights (MI) Read More »

Intelligence Tools Developed for Use Against US Adversaries Weaponized Against US (US)

Disputed Fact The Core Allegation The central thesis of Shadowgate is that military-grade psychological warfare and surveillance tools — originally built with US taxpayer dollars to target foreign adversaries — were deliberately turned inward and used against American citizens, politicians, and a sitting US president. Two whistleblowers, Patrick Bergy and Tore, both former government contractors

Intelligence Tools Developed for Use Against US Adversaries Weaponized Against US (US) Read More »