Campaign Finance

Conflict of Interest pertinent to financial transactions featuring MI SoS Jocelyn Benson and Silicon Valley Community Foundations (MI)

Reasonable Inference The financial relationship between SVCF and Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson warrants scrutiny as a structural conflict of interest facilitated through multiple layers of nonprofit intermediaries. SVCF, as the donor-advised fund custodian for the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, disbursed $69.5 million to the Center for Election Innovation and Research (CEIR). CEIR in turn […]

Conflict of Interest pertinent to financial transactions featuring MI SoS Jocelyn Benson and Silicon Valley Community Foundations (MI) Read More »

FinCEN SAR Records — Potential Evidentiary Gap Requiring Database Query (US)

Reasonable Inference Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs) filed by financial institutions with FinCEN in connection with ActBlue transactions may corroborate fraud patterns already identified through FEC data analysis. In September 2024, House Oversight Chairman James Comer and Republican colleagues formally requested from Treasury Secretary Yellen all SARs related to ActBlue, citing concerns about potential money laundering,

FinCEN SAR Records — Potential Evidentiary Gap Requiring Database Query (US) Read More »

Conspiracy Exposure — 18 U.S.C. § 371 (Up to 5 Years) (US)

Reasonable Inference If two or more persons coordinated to submit fraudulent contributions through ActBlue — whether through straw donor schemes, identity misappropriation, or foreign contribution routing — each is subject to conspiracy liability under 18 U.S.C. § 371, independent of whether the underlying offense was completed or whether each participant personally committed every element of

Conspiracy Exposure — 18 U.S.C. § 371 (Up to 5 Years) (US) Read More »

Identity Fraud Exposure — 18 U.S.C. § 1028 (Up to 15 Years) (US)

Reasonable Inference Where perpetrators used real individuals’ personal identifying information (name, address, card number) to make contributions without authorization, each instance constitutes potential identity fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1028, carrying up to 15 years imprisonment. Citations 18 U.S.C. § 1028(a)(7), (b)(1)(D), “Whoever, in a circumstance described in subsection (c) of this section— (7) knowingly

Identity Fraud Exposure — 18 U.S.C. § 1028 (Up to 15 Years) (US) Read More »

Money Laundering Exposure — 18 U.S.C. §§ 1956–1957 (US)

Reasonable Inference Where criminally derived funds (proceeds of straw donor violations or identity fraud) are transmitted through ActBlue to candidate accounts, laundering charges under 18 U.S.C. § 1956 are available. FECA violations are listed as specified unlawful activity under § 1956(c)(7)(D), enabling this theory. Citations Presidential Memorandum, “Investigation into Unlawful ‘Straw Donor’ and Foreign Contributions

Money Laundering Exposure — 18 U.S.C. §§ 1956–1957 (US) Read More »

Wire Fraud Exposure — 18 U.S.C. § 1343 (Up to 20 Years Per Count) (US)

Reasonable Inference Where fraudulent contributions are submitted via ActBlue’s internet platform, each electronic transmission constitutes a potential wire fraud predicate under 18 U.S.C. § 1343, which broadly covers any scheme to obtain money or property by false pretenses transmitted “by means of wire . . . communication in interstate or foreign commerce.” Wire fraud carries

Wire Fraud Exposure — 18 U.S.C. § 1343 (Up to 20 Years Per Count) (US) Read More »

DOJ Prosecution of Foreign-Connected Campaign Finance Violations (US)

Established Fact Foreign-connected campaign finance violations have resulted in federal criminal charges. In United States v. Michel, No. 1:19-cr-00148 (D.D.C.), prosecutors charged that fugitive Malaysian financier Jho Low’s funds were funneled through straw donors into federal campaign committees supporting a presidential candidate, in violation of FECA’s prohibition on foreign national contributions and the straw-donor ban.

DOJ Prosecution of Foreign-Connected Campaign Finance Violations (US) Read More »

Employer-Reimbursed Contribution Scheme Conviction (US)

Established Fact The Ninth Circuit affirmed conviction under § 30122 for orchestrating a scheme where an employer reimbursed employees for political contributions made in the employees’ names — directly analogous to third-party actors making contributions in victims’ names without authorization. Citations United States v. Whittemore, No. 13-10515 (9th Cir. Jan. 26, 2015) , “Whittemore distributed

Employer-Reimbursed Contribution Scheme Conviction (US) Read More »

Knowing Acceptance / Willful Blindness Standard — United States v. Danielczyk (VA)

Established Fact The Eastern District of Virginia affirmed that the straw donor prohibition under § 30122 requires knowing acceptance by the receiving committee for criminal liability on the committee’s part, but that ‘knowing’ may be inferred from willful blindness — the Global-Tech standard. Citations United States v. Danielczyk, 788 F. Supp. 2d 472, 479–481 (E.D.

Knowing Acceptance / Willful Blindness Standard — United States v. Danielczyk (VA) Read More »

Straw Donor Liability of Recipient Committees — FEC v. Weinsten (US)

Established Fact The Southern District of New York held that contributions made through straw donors violate § 30122 regardless of whether the ultimate recipient campaign was aware of the straw arrangement, establishing strict-liability principles for receiving committees. Citations FEC v. Weinsten, 462 F. Supp. 243, 250 (S.D.N.Y. 1978) (denying motion to dismiss FEC complaint alleging

Straw Donor Liability of Recipient Committees — FEC v. Weinsten (US) Read More »