United States

Secretary Benson Knowingly False Public Statement Regarding Window Obstruction at TCF (MI)

Disputed Fact [Disputed Fact – As to whether knowingly false] Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson publicly stated on radio that the window obstruction at the TCF Center was done by police because challengers were “breaking the windows.” This statement was demonstrably false: the pizza boxes and cardboard were placed on the inside of the

Secretary Benson Knowingly False Public Statement Regarding Window Obstruction at TCF (MI) Read More »

Secretary Benson False Public Statement Regarding Window Obstruction at TCF (MI)

Established Fact [Established Fact – Statement made; inside placement of cardboard confirmed] Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson publicly stated on radio that the window obstruction at the TCF Center was done by police because challengers were “breaking the windows.” This statement was demonstrably false: the pizza boxes and cardboard were placed on the inside

Secretary Benson False Public Statement Regarding Window Obstruction at TCF (MI) Read More »

CISA Created the Election Integrity Partnership to Circumvent the First Amendment – Explicit Government Acknowledgment of Constitutional Evasion (US)

Established Fact The most constitutionally significant documented fact in this investigation is CISA’s own internal acknowledgment that no government agency possessed “the explicit mandate to monitor and correct election mis- and disinformation,” and that the EIP was created to fill this acknowledged “critical gap” in government legal authority. This language – documented in internal CISA

CISA Created the Election Integrity Partnership to Circumvent the First Amendment – Explicit Government Acknowledgment of Constitutional Evasion (US) Read More »

WEC Administrator Meagan Wolfe Made Three Documented False Statements to the Wisconsin Legislature Regarding CTCL Grants, Database Access, and API Existence (WI)

Established Fact WEC Administrator Meagan Wolfe made the following specific statements to the Wisconsin State Assembly Committee on Campaigns and Elections, each of which was subsequently documented by the OSC to be contradicted by primary evidence: she stated she did not know about CTCL grants to the Zuckerberg 5 cities – contradicted by grant agreement

WEC Administrator Meagan Wolfe Made Three Documented False Statements to the Wisconsin Legislature Regarding CTCL Grants, Database Access, and API Existence (WI) Read More »

DHS February 7, 2022 Terrorism Advisory System Bulletin – Classifying Election Fraud Allegations as a “Terrorism Threat Driver,” Chilling Protected Political Speech Nationally (US)

Reasonable Inference [Reasonable Inference – As to unconstitutional chilling effect and absence of statutory authority] The Department of Homeland Security issued a National Terrorism Advisory System (NTAS) Bulletin on February 7, 2022, that explicitly classified “false or misleading narratives” regarding “unsubstantiated widespread election fraud” as a primary threat driver for domestic terrorism. The bulletin was

DHS February 7, 2022 Terrorism Advisory System Bulletin – Classifying Election Fraud Allegations as a “Terrorism Threat Driver,” Chilling Protected Political Speech Nationally (US) Read More »

DHS February 7, 2022 Terrorism Advisory System Bulletin – Classifying Election Fraud Allegations as a “Terrorism Threat Driver,” (US)

Established Fact [Established Fact – As to existence and content of bulletin] The Department of Homeland Security issued a National Terrorism Advisory System (NTAS) Bulletin on February 7, 2022, that explicitly classified “false or misleading narratives” regarding “unsubstantiated widespread election fraud” as a primary threat driver for domestic terrorism. The bulletin was documented in the

DHS February 7, 2022 Terrorism Advisory System Bulletin – Classifying Election Fraud Allegations as a “Terrorism Threat Driver,” (US) Read More »

Secretary Raffensperger’s False Representations to Congress – Affirmative Disinformation Campaign by State Official to Foreclose Federal Scrutiny (GA)

Disputed Fact [Disputed Fact – As to willful intent – requires further investigation] Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger transmitted a ten-page letter to the United States Congress on January 6, 2021, in which he represented, in substance, that “no fraud or irregularities occurred at all” in Georgia’s 2020 election. This representation: (1) was made with

Secretary Raffensperger’s False Representations to Congress – Affirmative Disinformation Campaign by State Official to Foreclose Federal Scrutiny (GA) Read More »

State-Sponsored Surveillance and Reporting of Private Citizen’s Political Facebook Post by Arizona SOS Under Katie Hobbs (AZ)

Established Fact The Arizona Secretary of State’s Office, under then-Secretary of State Katie Hobbs, utilized official government resources and personnel to monitor, identify, and report a private citizen’s Facebook post. The post in question claimed the sitting President of the United States had won Arizona – a disputed but at that time contested political assertion.

State-Sponsored Surveillance and Reporting of Private Citizen’s Political Facebook Post by Arizona SOS Under Katie Hobbs (AZ) Read More »

Lawsuit Dismissed Despite Court-Acknowledged Irregularities in Bailey v. Antrim County (MI)

Established Fact Each successive dismissal of Bailey v. Antrim County was publicly characterized by Michigan’s Secretary of State and Attorney General as an affirmative factual clearance of the 2020 election results — a characterization the underlying judicial record does not support. Upon the trial court’s May 18, 2021 dismissal, Secretary of State Benson stated that

Lawsuit Dismissed Despite Court-Acknowledged Irregularities in Bailey v. Antrim County (MI) Read More »

Bailey v. Antrim County, No. 2020-9238-CZ (Antrim Co. Cir. Ct.) – Only Case with Forensic Discovery; Dismissed When Remedies Satisfied, Not for Lack of Merit (MI)

Established Fact Bailey v. Antrim County is the most analytically significant Michigan case for this investigation. Judge Kevin Elsenheimer granted a preliminary injunction authorizing forensic examination of Antrim County’s tabulating machines, thumb drives, and memory cards – the only such order in Michigan. The case was ultimately dismissed when the court found all requested remedies

Bailey v. Antrim County, No. 2020-9238-CZ (Antrim Co. Cir. Ct.) – Only Case with Forensic Discovery; Dismissed When Remedies Satisfied, Not for Lack of Merit (MI) Read More »