Reasonable Inference

MI SoS Using State Resources for Partisan Projects (MI)

Reasonable Inference MI Department of State Director of “Special Projects” Sally Marsh used state resources to conduct partisan GOTV projects targeting youth and ex-convicts as well as poll worker recruitment efforts. As the former Deputy Campaign Manager for the MI Secretary of State, her efforts as a state employee were likely biased in favor of […]

MI SoS Using State Resources for Partisan Projects (MI) Read More »

Democrat Bias in CTCL “Zuckerberg 5” Grants and Election‑Bribery Exposure (WI)

Reasonable Inference CTCL provided approximately 8.8 million dollars to Milwaukee, Madison, Green Bay, Racine, and Kenosha—about 86% of all CTCL funds in Wisconsin—with contracts (Wisconsin Safe Voting Plan) containing claw‑back provisions and detailed operational requirements for drop boxes, “voter navigators,” and outreach programs in “communities of color.” The OSC Gableman report concluded this scheme “facially

Democrat Bias in CTCL “Zuckerberg 5” Grants and Election‑Bribery Exposure (WI) Read More »

Biden Voter Bias in MCELA–CEIR Grant for “Voter Education” as In‑Kind GOTV (MI)

Reasonable Inference Jocelyn Benson’s Michigan Center for Election Law and Administration (MCELA) received a multi‑million‑dollar grant from CEIR to fund “voter education” and digital outreach. The national and Michigan reports document that state resources and CEIR funds were used to produce and distribute messaging tailored to demographics associated with “Biden profile” voters, notwithstanding sufficient available

Biden Voter Bias in MCELA–CEIR Grant for “Voter Education” as In‑Kind GOTV (MI) Read More »

CTCL‑Conditioned Drop‑Box and Poll‑Worker Deployment (GA)

Reasonable Inference CTCL grant agreements with Georgia counties including Fulton and DeKalb funded the deployment of additional early-vote sites and enhanced staffing, with funding heavily favoring urban Democratic strongholds. In Georgia, over 94 percent of CTCL’s $45 million in grants went to 17 counties won by Biden, while less than 6 percent reached 26 counties

CTCL‑Conditioned Drop‑Box and Poll‑Worker Deployment (GA) Read More »

CTCL GIS Siting Algorithms Optimized Drop Box Placement for Partisan Demographic Capture Rather Than Neutral Civic Access (US)

Reasonable Inference CTCL and the Center for Civic Design (CCD) used internal GIS mapping and geolocation data to determine the physical placement of drop boxes. The documented result – extreme per-voter and per-square-mile disparities favoring Democratic urban precincts nationwide (e.g., 1 box per 4,000 voters in Delaware County, PA vs. 1 per 72,000 in Trump

CTCL GIS Siting Algorithms Optimized Drop Box Placement for Partisan Demographic Capture Rather Than Neutral Civic Access (US) Read More »

Wisconsin Safe Voting Plan and Election Bribery (WI)

Reasonable Inference The five Democratic-plurality “Zuckerberg 5” cities — Milwaukee, Madison, Green Bay, Racine, and Kenosha — received a total of $8.8 million in CTCL grants, all conditioned on implementation of the “Wisconsin Safe Voting Plan,” a joint election operations framework developed by those cities at CTCL’s direction. Grant funds were contractually bound to that

Wisconsin Safe Voting Plan and Election Bribery (WI) Read More »

MCELA-CEIR “Voter Education” as De Facto GOTV (MI)

Reasonable Inference Michigan’s Center for Election Law and Administration (MCELA), founded by Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson, received a multi-million-dollar CEIR grant for “voter education” and outreach, including direct communications to voters and digital targeting. The national report documents that this messaging was geared toward boosting participation among “Biden profile” demographics and that Michigan’s own

MCELA-CEIR “Voter Education” as De Facto GOTV (MI) Read More »

Asymmetric Legal Defense Funding – One-Sided Legal Representation (US)

Reasonable Inference The Election Official Legal Defense Network (EOLDN) — a project of the Center for Election Innovation and Research (CEIR), which received $69.5 million from the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative in 2020 — provided free pro bono legal counsel to election officials facing legal exposure related to their administration of the 2020 election. EOLDN connected

Asymmetric Legal Defense Funding – One-Sided Legal Representation (US) Read More »

USAID/GEC‑Linked Funding Streams into Domestic “Disinformation” NGOs (US)

Reasonable Inference The Global Engagement Center (GEC) — a State Department entity statutorily mandated to counter foreign propaganda — provided grants and contracts to NGOs that later participated in domestic “election misinformation” work, including as members or stakeholders of the Election Integrity Partnership (EIP). GEC funded the Disinfo Cloud platform (via a $3 million contract

USAID/GEC‑Linked Funding Streams into Domestic “Disinformation” NGOs (US) Read More »

CTCL “Zuckerberg 5” Grants and Election‑Bribery Exposure (WI)

Reasonable Inference In Wisconsin, CTCL provided approximately $8.8 million to the five largest cities — Milwaukee, Madison, Green Bay, Racine, and Kenosha — representing roughly 86% of all CTCL funds distributed in the state. The grants were conditioned on adherence to the “Wisconsin Safe Voting Plan,” a detailed operational framework that included claw-back provisions requiring

CTCL “Zuckerberg 5” Grants and Election‑Bribery Exposure (WI) Read More »