Disputed Fact

Attorney Sanctions Used to Deter Election Integrity Litigation in Arizona Election Cases (AZ)

Disputed Fact The Maricopa County Superior Court ordered the Arizona Republican Party and its lawyers to pay opposing counsel’s fees after they sued over Maricopa County’s 2020 election procedures and sought a broader hand‑count audit. In doing so, the court labeled the lawsuit “groundless” and said it was brought for the “improper purpose” of undermining

Attorney Sanctions Used to Deter Election Integrity Litigation in Arizona Election Cases (AZ) Read More »

Systematic Attorney Discipline Against Election Litigation Attorneys (US)

Disputed Fact Post 2020 election integrity lawyers were subjected to an unusually broad, coordinated pattern of professional discipline, and suggesting this may function as systemic deterrence (“lawfare”) against election fraud litigation. Multiple high profile election integrity attorneys—Rudy Giuliani, Sidney Powell, John Eastman, Jenna Ellis, and Michigan attorney Matthew DePerno—faced disbarment, suspension, or bar referrals explicitly

Systematic Attorney Discipline Against Election Litigation Attorneys (US) Read More »

50% of All Election Lawsuits Did Not Receive A Fair Hearing (US)

Reasonable Inference Of 64 election lawsuits examined in source documents, 20 cases (31%) were dismissed on procedural grounds-principally lack of standing-without merits adjudication. An additional 14 (22%) were voluntarily withdrawn, many under sanctions threats. Only 30 (47%) proceeded to any merits-characterized decision, and in those cases, plaintiffs operated without meaningful discovery access. The Supreme Court’s

50% of All Election Lawsuits Did Not Receive A Fair Hearing (US) Read More »

22 of 30 Cases Decided Upon Merit Favored Plaintiff Arguments (US)

Disputed Fact [Disputed Fact – 22/30 favorable to plaintiffs figure requires independent verification] Of 64 major post-2020 election cases analyzed, 20 (31%) were dismissed on procedural grounds – predominantly standing. An additional 14 (22%) were voluntarily withdrawn, many under threat of Rule 11 sanctions. Only 30 (47%) proceeded to what was characterized as a merits

22 of 30 Cases Decided Upon Merit Favored Plaintiff Arguments (US) Read More »

Costantino v. Detroit, No. 20-014780-AW (Wayne Co. Cir. Ct.) – Dismissal – Court Basis for Dismissal Disputed (MI)

Disputed Fact [Disputed Fact – As to court’s factual conclusion] A Michigan circuit court dismissed election challenges related to Detroit ballot-counting procedures at the TCF Center – including systemic exclusion of Republican poll challengers – without permitting the factual record to be developed through discovery. Judge Timothy Kenny specifically declined to admit evidence from certified

Costantino v. Detroit, No. 20-014780-AW (Wayne Co. Cir. Ct.) – Dismissal – Court Basis for Dismissal Disputed (MI) Read More »

Private “Zuckerbucks” CTCL Funding Injected Into Specific Counties; Every Legal Challenge to Targeted Funding Dismissed – Judicial Shielded Bribery Scheme for Privately Financed Election Administration (PA)

Disputed Fact [Disputed Fact – As to characterization as judicially shielded bribery scheme] While direct bribery of a Pennsylvania judge is not explicitly documented in the source record, the investigative record establishes the following sequence: (1) millions of dollars in private CTCL grants were injected into specific Pennsylvania counties – including Philadelphia, Delaware, and Centre

Private “Zuckerbucks” CTCL Funding Injected Into Specific Counties; Every Legal Challenge to Targeted Funding Dismissed – Judicial Shielded Bribery Scheme for Privately Financed Election Administration (PA) Read More »

Bribery of Maricopa County Superior Court Judges – Harris/Thaler Law Firm Criminal Investigation (AZ)

Disputed Fact [Disputed Fact aspect of this finding] An extensive investigation by the Harris/Thaler Law Firm, submitted as a formal brief in Maricopa County Superior Court criminal case CR2021-134056, alleged that public officials – including more than two dozen judges of the Maricopa County Superior Court – accepted bribes to protect racketeering enterprises and to

Bribery of Maricopa County Superior Court Judges – Harris/Thaler Law Firm Criminal Investigation (AZ) Read More »

Fulton County Unlawfully Swapped Thirty-Five Advance Voting Tabulator Memory Cards During a Live Election (GA)

Disputed Fact During the course of advance voting, security seals were cut, and the memory cards of thirty-five tabulators were unlawfully removed- and replaced with other memory cards. [Disputed Fact – as to EAC approval of Dominion Pan Notice for fielded equipment.  Instead of swap out for every 10K votes, they ended up doing swap

Fulton County Unlawfully Swapped Thirty-Five Advance Voting Tabulator Memory Cards During a Live Election (GA) Read More »

Ordered Erasure of Blue Crest Ballot Sorter Data (PA)

Disputed Fact Delaware County Director of Elections James Allen explicitly ordered the Blue Crest ballot sorter to be completely erased of all November 3, 2020 election data in May 2021 – strategically timed immediately prior to the county’s fulfillment of Right to Know Law requests. The Blue Crest machine’s data would have provided independent verification

Ordered Erasure of Blue Crest Ballot Sorter Data (PA) Read More »

Physical Destruction of Machine Tapes and Return Sheets by County Officials (PA)

Disputed Fact Named witness Regina Miller states she personally observed Attorney Thomas Gallagher and James Ziegelhoffer physically tear election data into pieces and place it in the trash, stating they would “have a campfire to burn the data.” Ziegelhoffer stated the data had “no audit value” because it “wouldn’t match the election results.” Director of

Physical Destruction of Machine Tapes and Return Sheets by County Officials (PA) Read More »