Bribery

Misappropriation of Public Funds by DA Fani Willis and Special Prosecutor Nathan Wade (GA)

Reasonable Inference [Reasonable Inference – That appearance created non-neutral prosecutorial incentives] Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis, the officer of the court responsible for prosecuting individuals who challenged the 2020 election results in Georgia – including former President Trump and eighteen co-defendants – was found by Fulton County Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee to have […]

Misappropriation of Public Funds by DA Fani Willis and Special Prosecutor Nathan Wade (GA) Read More »

Prosecutorial Financial Conflict of Interest – DA Fani Willis and Special Prosecutor Nathan Wade; Judicial Finding of “Significant Appearance of Impropriety” (GA)

Established Fact Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis, who led the primary state-level prosecution of individuals challenging the 2020 Georgia election results, was found by Fulton County Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee to have maintained a personal romantic relationship with Special Prosecutor Nathan Wade — whom she hired and paid $653,881 from public prosecution funds.

Prosecutorial Financial Conflict of Interest – DA Fani Willis and Special Prosecutor Nathan Wade; Judicial Finding of “Significant Appearance of Impropriety” (GA) Read More »

Ward v. Jackson – Government Counsel’s Representation to Arizona Supreme Court That Ballots Were Segregated; Physical State of Ballot Corpus Inconsistent with Representation (AZ)

Reasonable Inference In Ward v. Jackson, Arizona Supreme Court Case No. CV2020-015285, the Secretary of State’s counsel represented to the court that the challenged ballots had been segregated and preserved in a manner that would permit the relief requested. The Cyber Ninjas audit, completed in September 2021, found that the physical ballot corpus was not

Ward v. Jackson – Government Counsel’s Representation to Arizona Supreme Court That Ballots Were Segregated; Physical State of Ballot Corpus Inconsistent with Representation (AZ) Read More »

Alleged RICO Bribery Network Among Maricopa County Superior Court Judges – Harris/Thaler Law Firm Criminal Investigation (AZ)

Reasonable Inference [Reasonable Inference aspect of this finding] An extensive investigation by the Harris/Thaler Law Firm, submitted as a formal brief in Maricopa County Superior Court criminal case CR2021-134056, alleged that public officials – including more than two dozen judges of the Maricopa County Superior Court – accepted bribes to protect racketeering enterprises and to

Alleged RICO Bribery Network Among Maricopa County Superior Court Judges – Harris/Thaler Law Firm Criminal Investigation (AZ) Read More »

Bribery of Maricopa County Superior Court Judges – Harris/Thaler Law Firm Criminal Investigation (AZ)

Disputed Fact [Disputed Fact aspect of this finding] An extensive investigation by the Harris/Thaler Law Firm, submitted as a formal brief in Maricopa County Superior Court criminal case CR2021-134056, alleged that public officials – including more than two dozen judges of the Maricopa County Superior Court – accepted bribes to protect racketeering enterprises and to

Bribery of Maricopa County Superior Court Judges – Harris/Thaler Law Firm Criminal Investigation (AZ) Read More »

Former Maduro Attorney Orders Destruction of Dominion Evidence

The legal landscape surrounding the 2020 U.S. election and international narcoterrorism has reached a critical juncture, characterized by unprecedented judicial actions and high-profile military interventions. At the center of judicial actions related to these events is DC Magistrate Judge Moxila Upadhyaya. Election-Related Cases Presided Over by Judge Upadhyaya: Federal Prosecution of Donald J. Trump (2020 Election

Former Maduro Attorney Orders Destruction of Dominion Evidence Read More »