United States

Wisconsin Voters Alliance v. Pence – Proactive Grievance Threat by Federal Judge (WI)

Attorney Sanctions, Established Fact, Judicial Malfeasance, United States, Wisconsin /

Established Fact Following the voluntary withdrawal of Wisconsin Voters Alliance v. Pence — a lawsuit challenging the validity of 2020 election procedures in five states, filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia — Judge James E. Boasberg issued a show-cause order on January 7, 2021, the same day plaintiffs’ counsel filed

Wisconsin Voters Alliance v. Pence – Proactive Grievance Threat by Federal Judge (WI) Read More »

Malicious Prosecution of Attorneys for Election Integrity Litigation in Michigan (MI)

Attorney Sanctions, Disputed Fact, Judicial Malfeasance, Michigan, United States /

Disputed Fact Attorney Matt DePerno and attorney Stefanie Lambert Junttila — both active in 2020 election-challenge litigation and forensic investigations of electronic voting systems — were charged with felonies arising from their involvement in unauthorized access to and testing of voting tabulators. On August 1–2, 2023, Michigan special prosecutor D.J. Hilson — appointed by Attorney

Malicious Prosecution of Attorneys for Election Integrity Litigation in Michigan (MI) Read More »

Attorney Sanctions Used to Deter election Integrity Litigation in Michigan (MI)

Attorney Sanctions, Disputed Fact, Judicial Malfeasance, Michigan, United States /

Disputed Fact In King v. Whitmer, Judge Linda V. Parker sanctioned all nine pro-Trump attorneys — including Sidney Powell and L. Lin Wood — ordering $175,250 in fee-shifting, twelve hours of mandatory legal education on pleading standards and election law, and referrals to their home bars for possible suspension or disbarment. Parker described the suit

Attorney Sanctions Used to Deter election Integrity Litigation in Michigan (MI) Read More »

Attorney Plea Agreements – Coerced Admissions Under Financial Duress (GA)

Attorney Sanctions, Disputed Fact, Georgia, Judicial Malfeasance, United States /

Disputed Fact Attorneys Jenna Ellis, Kenneth Chesebro, and Sidney Powell each pleaded guilty in October 2023 to reduced charges — with the RICO count dropped in every instance in exchange for probation and cooperation obligations. Ellis stated in open court that she had “failed to do my due diligence” and that “if I knew then

Attorney Plea Agreements – Coerced Admissions Under Financial Duress (GA) Read More »

Malicious Prosecution of Attorneys for Providing Legal Advice Regarding Elections (GA)

Attorney Sanctions, Disputed Fact, Georgia, Judicial Malfeasance, United States /

Disputed Fact Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis used Georgia’s RICO statute to indict five lawyers who had provided legal advice to the Trump campaign — Giuliani, Powell, Eastman, Chesebro, and Ellis — charging specific legal-service activities, including the drafting of legal memoranda and the filing of a federal court complaint, as predicate criminal acts.[1]

Malicious Prosecution of Attorneys for Providing Legal Advice Regarding Elections (GA) Read More »

Attorney Sanctions Used to Deter Election Integrity Litigation in Arizona Election Cases (AZ)

Arizona, Attorney Sanctions, Disputed Fact, Judicial Malfeasance, United States /

Disputed Fact The Maricopa County Superior Court ordered the Arizona Republican Party and its lawyers to pay opposing counsel’s fees after they sued over Maricopa County’s 2020 election procedures and sought a broader hand‑count audit. In doing so, the court labeled the lawsuit “groundless” and said it was brought for the “improper purpose” of undermining

Attorney Sanctions Used to Deter Election Integrity Litigation in Arizona Election Cases (AZ) Read More »

Systematic Attorney Discipline Against Election Litigation Attorneys (US)

Attorney Sanctions, Disputed Fact, Judicial Malfeasance, United States /

Disputed Fact Post 2020 election integrity lawyers were subjected to an unusually broad, coordinated pattern of professional discipline, and suggesting this may function as systemic deterrence (“lawfare”) against election fraud litigation. Multiple high profile election integrity attorneys—Rudy Giuliani, Sidney Powell, John Eastman, Jenna Ellis, and Michigan attorney Matthew DePerno—faced disbarment, suspension, or bar referrals explicitly

Systematic Attorney Discipline Against Election Litigation Attorneys (US) Read More »

How Much Election Fraud Is “Significant”?

About Elections, Advisories, Established Fact, Key Concepts, United States /

2020 Election Analysis To assess the materiality of alleged electoral irregularities in the 2020 presidential election, a threshold analysis must first establish the minimum vote margin required to alter the election outcome. Under Article II of the United States Constitution and the Twelfth Amendment, presidential election results are determined by Electoral College allocation, requiring a

How Much Election Fraud Is “Significant”? Read More »

Judicial Tenure Commission refusal to take disciplinary actions (MI)

Case Dismissal, Established Fact, Judicial Malfeasance, Michigan, United States /

Established Fact In a June 30, 2025 response to complaint filed with the Michigan Judicial Tenure Commission against sitting MI Supreme Court Justice Kyra H Bolden, the commission asserted that it had completed an investigation of the judicial misconduct complaint and determined that no disciplinary action was required against Bolden for accepting and $82,500 contribution

Judicial Tenure Commission refusal to take disciplinary actions (MI) Read More »

Michigan Supreme Court refusal to call for investigation into bribery charges of MI SoS and one of the MI Supreme Court Justices (MI)

Case Dismissal, Established Fact, Featured, Judicial Malfeasance, Michigan, United States /

Established Fact An appeal of the AGC ruling in favor of MI SoS Benson was filed with the MI Supreme Court. On May 22, 2025, the MI Supreme Court responded “On order of the Court, the complaint for superintending control is considered, and relief is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that it should

Michigan Supreme Court refusal to call for investigation into bribery charges of MI SoS and one of the MI Supreme Court Justices (MI) Read More »