Pre-Election Conspiracy

Fight Back Table / Democracy Defense Coalition (US)

Established Fact [Established Fact — Organizations exist, memos documented] Mike Podhorzer (AFL-CIO senior advisor, described by Time as the “architect” of the shadow campaign) and Deirdre Schifeling led the “Fight Back Table” and “Democracy Defense Coalition” — organizations operating out of 1536 U Street NW, Washington, D.C. These entities drafted internal memos predicting specific battleground […]

Fight Back Table / Democracy Defense Coalition (US) Read More »

“Inside/Outside Strategy” – Coordinated Federal-NGO Pincer Operation (US)

Reasonable Inference The organizational model confirmed in the Time magazine reporting involves AFL-CIO operatives and allied dark money networks operating internally (Fight Back Table, Democracy Defense Coalition) while external NGO and activist networks applied simultaneous external pressure (Protect the Results, ShutDown DC) — a coordinated dual-track strategy designed to control the post-election environment. The documented

“Inside/Outside Strategy” – Coordinated Federal-NGO Pincer Operation (US) Read More »

Protect the Results Coalition Seditious Conspiracy (US)

Disputed Fact [Disputed Fact — As to whether planning contemplated unlawful force] The Protect the Results coalition launched June 12, 2020, comprising 148 organizational partners that publicly committed to trigger street-level mass protest and unrest if Trump contested the election. Coalition members’ public statements emphasized peaceful, lawful protest; whether the planning contemplated unlawful force is

Protect the Results Coalition Seditious Conspiracy (US) Read More »

Protect the Results Coalition – Multi-Organizational Mobilization Infrastructure (US)

Established Fact [Established Fact — Coalition existed; mobilization commitments documented] The Protect the Results coalition launched June 12, 2020, comprising 148 organizational partners — including Indivisible, MoveOn.org, Stand Up America, and the SEIU — that publicly committed to trigger street-level mass protest if Trump contested the election. The coalition expanded to over 80 partners by

Protect the Results Coalition – Multi-Organizational Mobilization Infrastructure (US) Read More »

Pre-Election Targeting of Capitol Vulnerabilities (US)

Established Fact ShutDown DC leadership used ArcGIS geographic information software to map vulnerabilities in Washington, D.C.’s critical infrastructure — including bridges, government buildings, transportation chokepoints, and telecommunications nodes — and trained activists in “Hong Kong-style” riot tactics and infrastructure blockade techniques. This mapping and training was conducted before the election, in explicit anticipation of a

Pre-Election Targeting of Capitol Vulnerabilities (US) Read More »

Obstruction Tactics Planned by Federal Employees (US)

Disputed Fact [Disputed Fact — Official government status of participants unconfirmed by independent investigation] Federal employees from multiple agencies attended pre-election training sessions hosted by ShutDown DC addressing “go slow” tactics, workplace obstruction, and resistance planning in the event of a contested election outcome. Identified participants included individuals who identified their agency affiliations during sessions.

Obstruction Tactics Planned by Federal Employees (US) Read More »

“Feds for Democracy” – Federal Employee Network (US)

Established Fact [Established Fact — Federal employee training sessions documented; participant self-identification recorded] Federal employees from multiple agencies attended pre-election training sessions hosted by ShutDown DC addressing “go slow” tactics, workplace obstruction, and resistance planning in the event of a contested election outcome. Identified participants included individuals who identified their agency affiliations during sessions. Independent

“Feds for Democracy” – Federal Employee Network (US) Read More »

“The Count” – Pre-Election Manifesto for Capitol Takeover (US)

Established Fact “The Count” was a pre-election contingency document attributed to operatives from the Real Justice PAC — Zack Malitz, Becky Bond, and Brandon Evans — explicitly calling for “mass civil disobedience to shut down the capital and delay votes” and to make it “physically impossible for Congress to meet” if the Electoral College count

“The Count” – Pre-Election Manifesto for Capitol Takeover (US) Read More »

Deliberate Relaxation of Election Security Via Court-Ordered Modification of Signature Verification – Unauthorized Pre-Election Administrative Change (AZ)

Disputed Fact Disputed fact as to coordinated intent, but Arizona Democratic Party v. Hobbs, No. 2:20-cv-01143 (D. Ariz. 2020), was a federal court action in which a district court entered an injunction extending cure deadlines for unsigned absentee ballots. The Ninth Circuit stayed the injunction on October 6, 2020, before it took effect. Whether the

Deliberate Relaxation of Election Security Via Court-Ordered Modification of Signature Verification – Unauthorized Pre-Election Administrative Change (AZ) Read More »

Court Ordered Modification of Signature Verification – Pre-Election Administrative Change (AZ)

Established Fact Federal court injunction entered; stayed by Ninth Circuit before election. Arizona Democratic Party v. Hobbs, No. 2:20-cv-01143 (D. Ariz. 2020), was a federal court action (not a consent decree) in which a district court entered an injunction requiring an extended cure period for unsigned absentee ballots. The Ninth Circuit stayed the injunction on

Court Ordered Modification of Signature Verification – Pre-Election Administrative Change (AZ) Read More »