Court Procedure

Severe Sampling Limitations in Ward v. Jackson (AZ)

Established Fact The state court restricted forensic document examiners to reviewing only 100 randomly selected mail-in ballots for signature comparisons and evaluated only 1,626 duplicated ballots. The court concluded errors were statistically negligible and dismissed the case, preventing a statistically significant or comprehensive forensic audit of Maricopa County ballots. The arbitrarily narrow discovery perimeter precluded […]

Severe Sampling Limitations in Ward v. Jackson (AZ) Read More »

Deliberate Destruction of Records – Favorito v. Cooney (Fulton Co. Super. Ct.) – One of Three Discovery Cases; Access to Ballots Controlled by Same Officials Who Destroyed Records (GA)

Reasonable Inference [Reasonable Inference – Prior record destruction compromised the discovery process] Favorito v. Cooney was one of only three post-2020 election cases, nationally, in which some form of discovery was permitted. However, the discovery was supervised and channeled through the same Fulton County officials who, per the EOG Report, had already admitted destroying the

Deliberate Destruction of Records – Favorito v. Cooney (Fulton Co. Super. Ct.) – One of Three Discovery Cases; Access to Ballots Controlled by Same Officials Who Destroyed Records (GA) Read More »

Favorito v. Cooney (Fulton Co. Super. Ct.) – One of Three Discovery Cases; Access to Ballots Controlled by Same Officials Who Destroyed Records (GA)

Established Fact Favorito v. Cooney, No. 2020CV343938 (Fulton Cty. Super. Ct.), was among the few post-2020 election challenge cases in which a court authorized physical access to actual election materials: on May 21, 2021, Chief Judge Brian Amero (by designation) granted petitioners’ motion to unseal and inspect and scan the November 3, 2020 general election

Favorito v. Cooney (Fulton Co. Super. Ct.) – One of Three Discovery Cases; Access to Ballots Controlled by Same Officials Who Destroyed Records (GA) Read More »

Former Maduro Attorney Orders Destruction of Dominion Evidence

The legal landscape surrounding the 2020 U.S. election and international narcoterrorism has reached a critical juncture, characterized by unprecedented judicial actions and high-profile military interventions. At the center of judicial actions related to these events is DC Magistrate Judge Moxila Upadhyaya. Election-Related Cases Presided Over by Judge Upadhyaya: Federal Prosecution of Donald J. Trump (2020 Election

Former Maduro Attorney Orders Destruction of Dominion Evidence Read More »