Severe Sampling Limitations in Ward v. Jackson (AZ)
Established Fact The state court restricted forensic document examiners to reviewing only 100 randomly selected mail-in ballots for signature comparisons and evaluated only 1,626 duplicated ballots. The court concluded errors were statistically negligible and dismissed the case, preventing a statistically significant or comprehensive forensic audit of Maricopa County ballots. The arbitrarily narrow discovery perimeter precluded […]
Severe Sampling Limitations in Ward v. Jackson (AZ) Read More »
