Influence Operation

DNC Participated in EIP Jira Ticketing System; RNC Declined – Structural Partisan Asymmetry in Government-Sponsored Censorship Apparatus (US)

Reasonable Inference [Reasonable Inference – As to partisan effect and FEC in-kind contribution theory] The EIP invited both the Democratic National Committee and the Republican National Committee to participate as “external stakeholders” in its Jira ticketing system – the mechanism through which suppression requests were submitted, routed, and tracked against platform action outcomes. The DNC […]

DNC Participated in EIP Jira Ticketing System; RNC Declined – Structural Partisan Asymmetry in Government-Sponsored Censorship Apparatus (US) Read More »

DNC Participated in EIP Jira Ticketing System; RNC Declined (US)

Established Fact [Established Fact – As to DNC participation and RNC non-participation] The EIP invited both the Democratic National Committee and the Republican National Committee to participate as “external stakeholders” in its Jira ticketing system – the mechanism through which suppression requests were submitted, routed, and tracked against platform action outcomes. The DNC accepted and

DNC Participated in EIP Jira Ticketing System; RNC Declined (US) Read More »

WEC Chairperson Ann Jacobs Issued Public Statement Denying WEC Lawbreaking Despite Documented Felony Referrals by Racine County Sheriff – Official Misinformation by a State Actor (WI)

Established Fact Wisconsin Elections Commission Chairperson Ann Jacobs issued a public press release on October 28, 2021, affirmatively stating that no WEC member had broken the law in connection with the nursing home absentee voting directives that the WEC had issued in 2020. This statement was made with knowledge of, or reckless disregard for, the

WEC Chairperson Ann Jacobs Issued Public Statement Denying WEC Lawbreaking Despite Documented Felony Referrals by Racine County Sheriff – Official Misinformation by a State Actor (WI) Read More »

Secretary Boockvar’s Last-Minute Differential Ballot-Curing Guidance – Government-Authored Intentional Information Asymmetry in Election Administration (PA)

Disputed Fact [Disputed Fact – As to whether non-uniform application was intentional or logistical] Pennsylvania Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar issued guidance to select Pennsylvania counties on the evening of November 2, 2020 – the night before Election Day – encouraging certain counties to notify party representatives of defective mail-in ballot envelopes before Election Day.

Secretary Boockvar’s Last-Minute Differential Ballot-Curing Guidance – Government-Authored Intentional Information Asymmetry in Election Administration (PA) Read More »

Secretary Boockvar’s Last-Minute Differential Ballot-Curing Guidance – Government-Authored Information Asymmetry in Election Administration (PA)

Established Fact [Established Fact – As to guidance issuance and non-uniform application] Pennsylvania Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar issued guidance to select Pennsylvania counties on the evening of November 2, 2020 – the night before Election Day – encouraging certain counties to notify party representatives of defective mail-in ballot envelopes before Election Day. This guidance

Secretary Boockvar’s Last-Minute Differential Ballot-Curing Guidance – Government-Authored Information Asymmetry in Election Administration (PA) Read More »

MI AG Election Law Guidance to Law Enforcement Focused Upon Poll Challenger Restrictions to Exclusion of Poll Challenger Rights (MI)

Reasonable Inference How the Attorney General’s own law-enforcement guidance treated poll challenger rights — the near-total 2020 silence on challenger rights, contrasted with the restriction-heavy challenger section of the 2024 guidance letter.   The threshold fact: there was no 2020 AG challenger guidance Analyzing what the Attorney General told law enforcement about poll challengers in

MI AG Election Law Guidance to Law Enforcement Focused Upon Poll Challenger Restrictions to Exclusion of Poll Challenger Rights (MI) Read More »

Intelligence Tools Developed for Use Against US Adversaries Weaponized Against US (US)

Disputed Fact The Core Allegation The central thesis of Shadowgate is that military-grade psychological warfare and surveillance tools — originally built with US taxpayer dollars to target foreign adversaries — were deliberately turned inward and used against American citizens, politicians, and a sitting US president. Two whistleblowers, Patrick Bergy and Tore, both former government contractors

Intelligence Tools Developed for Use Against US Adversaries Weaponized Against US (US) Read More »

Michigan AG Dana Nessel Directed Investigations Targeting Private Citizens for Public Speech About Sworn Election Testimony – Viewpoint-Based Criminal Investigation Under Color of Law (MI)

Established Fact [Established Fact – As to investigations being opened] Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel, acting in her official capacity and in coordination with the Michigan State Police, launched investigations between November 2020 and July 2021 targeting private citizens who had spoken publicly about election irregularities – specifically including individuals who had submitted sworn affidavits

Michigan AG Dana Nessel Directed Investigations Targeting Private Citizens for Public Speech About Sworn Election Testimony – Viewpoint-Based Criminal Investigation Under Color of Law (MI) Read More »

Secretary Raffensperger’s False Representations to Congress – Affirmative Disinformation Campaign by State Official to Foreclose Federal Scrutiny (GA)

Established Fact [Established Fact – As to contradictions, omissions, and ProV&V timing] Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger transmitted a ten-page letter to the United States Congress on January 6, 2021, in which he represented, in substance, that “no fraud or irregularities occurred at all” in Georgia’s 2020 election. This representation: (1) was made with knowledge

Secretary Raffensperger’s False Representations to Congress – Affirmative Disinformation Campaign by State Official to Foreclose Federal Scrutiny (GA) Read More »

Deliberate Obstruction Via Official Labeling of Forensic Audit Findings as “Misinformation” Before Independent Verification – Cyber Ninjas, Speckin Forensic Report, Pulitzer PKAD Report (AZ)

Reasonable Inference [Reasonable Inference – As to obstruction theory] The Arizona source record documents that official state actors and media outlets characterized election integrity analyses – including findings from the Cyber Ninjas forensic audit, the Speckin forensic handwriting and ballot analysis, and the Pulitzer PKAD cybersecurity report – as “misinformation” or “disinformation” before any independent

Deliberate Obstruction Via Official Labeling of Forensic Audit Findings as “Misinformation” Before Independent Verification – Cyber Ninjas, Speckin Forensic Report, Pulitzer PKAD Report (AZ) Read More »