Wisconsin

Weaponization of Laches Doctrine to Avoid Merits in Trump v. Biden (WI)

Reasonable Inference The Wisconsin Supreme Court, in a 4-3 decision, declined to rule on the substantive merits of three of four claims regarding absentee ballot administration, applying the procedural doctrine of laches on the basis that the delay in bringing suit was “unreasonable in the extreme.” This application permanently insulated serious allegations regarding unpromulgated election […]

Weaponization of Laches Doctrine to Avoid Merits in Trump v. Biden (WI) Read More »

Justice Rebecca Bradley’s Teigen Concurrence – Judicial Acknowledgment That “Equity” Override of Statute Immunized Unlawful Election Administration (WI)

Established Fact In Teigen v. Wisconsin Elections Commission, Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice Rebecca Grassl Bradley wrote separately to note that the Wisconsin Supreme Court’s 2020 Trump v. Biden decision had allowed “equity” concerns – specifically, the disruption that post-election relief would cause – to override mandatory statutory requirements. This is a finding by a sitting

Justice Rebecca Bradley’s Teigen Concurrence – Judicial Acknowledgment That “Equity” Override of Statute Immunized Unlawful Election Administration (WI) Read More »

Trump v. Biden, No. 2020AP2038 (Wis. S. Ct.) – 4-3 Decision Dismissing Three of Four Claims on Laches; Drop Boxes Subsequently Ruled Illegal (WI)

Established Fact The Wisconsin Supreme Court, in a 4-3 decision, dismissed three of four claims in the Trump post-recount challenge under the doctrine of laches, ruling the campaign’s delay in bringing the challenges was “unreasonable in the extreme.” The challenged conduct included the WEC’s drop-box authorization, altered certification envelopes, and “Democracy in the Park” pre-canvassing

Trump v. Biden, No. 2020AP2038 (Wis. S. Ct.) – 4-3 Decision Dismissing Three of Four Claims on Laches; Drop Boxes Subsequently Ruled Illegal (WI) Read More »

Financial Audit Needed in Trump v. Biden – Wisconsin Supreme Court 4-3 Dismissal on Laches of Claims re: “Democracy in the Park,” Indefinitely Confined Voters, and Altered Certification Envelopes (WI)

Reasonable Inference [Reasonable Inference – As to financial audit need] In Trump v. Biden (Wis. Sup. Ct. 2020), the Wisconsin Supreme Court dismissed three of four election challenge claims under the doctrine of laches in a 4-3 decision. The dismissed claims included challenges to (1) the WEC’s absentee ballot distribution in “Democracy in the Park”

Financial Audit Needed in Trump v. Biden – Wisconsin Supreme Court 4-3 Dismissal on Laches of Claims re: “Democracy in the Park,” Indefinitely Confined Voters, and Altered Certification Envelopes (WI) Read More »

Trump v. Biden – Wisconsin Supreme Court 4-3 Dismissal on Laches of Claims re: “Democracy in the Park,” Indefinitely Confined Voters, and Altered Certification Envelopes (WI)

Established Fact [Established Fact – As to 4-3 ruling and dismissal basis] In Trump v. Biden (Wis. Sup. Ct. 2020), the Wisconsin Supreme Court dismissed three of four election challenge claims under the doctrine of laches in a 4-3 decision. The dismissed claims included challenges to (1) the WEC’s absentee ballot distribution in “Democracy in

Trump v. Biden – Wisconsin Supreme Court 4-3 Dismissal on Laches of Claims re: “Democracy in the Park,” Indefinitely Confined Voters, and Altered Certification Envelopes (WI) Read More »

Quid Pro Quo CEIR-Linked Private Funding of Legal Defense for Subpoenaed Election Officials (WI)

Reasonable Inference [Reasonable Inference – As to ethics violation and quid pro quo structure] The Wisconsin Office of the Special Counsel (OSC), led by former Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice Michael Gableman, documented in its Second Interim Investigative Report that the Election Officials Legal Defense Network (EOLDN) – an organization linked through funding networks to the

Quid Pro Quo CEIR-Linked Private Funding of Legal Defense for Subpoenaed Election Officials (WI) Read More »

Election Officials Legal Defense Network (EOLDN) – CEIR-Linked Private Funding of Legal Defense for Subpoenaed Election Officials; Providing “Anything of Value” to Procure Non-Compliance With Legislative Oversight (WI)

Established Fact [Established Fact – As to EOLDN existence and free counsel provision] The Wisconsin Office of the Special Counsel (OSC), led by former Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice Michael Gableman, documented in its Second Interim Investigative Report that the Election Officials Legal Defense Network (EOLDN) – an organization linked through funding networks to the Center

Election Officials Legal Defense Network (EOLDN) – CEIR-Linked Private Funding of Legal Defense for Subpoenaed Election Officials; Providing “Anything of Value” to Procure Non-Compliance With Legislative Oversight (WI) Read More »

WEC Failure to Maintain Accurate WisVote Database / Inadequate FIDO Key Security (WI)

Established Fact The Wisconsin Legislative Audit Bureau determined that WEC failed to maintain a sufficiently accurate WisVote voter registration database. WEC issued 3,137 FIDO Keys and cannot account for how many were actually issued. At least one county received 15 keys when it requested 2. Of 2,938 active keys at one audit point, 1,929 (66%)

WEC Failure to Maintain Accurate WisVote Database / Inadequate FIDO Key Security (WI) Read More »

Command Central (Dominion Reseller) Holding Wisconsin Ballots in Minnesota (WI)

Established Fact The OSC learned that Command Central, LLC – a Dominion reseller and servicer – received images of cast ballots on election night via the internet and is alleged to be holding actual cast ballots at its offices in Minnesota. Command Central did not comply with OSC legislative subpoenas. If Wisconsin ballots were transported

Command Central (Dominion Reseller) Holding Wisconsin Ballots in Minnesota (WI) Read More »

Voting Machines Wiped During Vendor Updates (WI)

Established Fact The OSC consulted with multiple computer security experts regarding voting machine data retention in Wisconsin. A representative of one machine manufacturer stated that voting machines “were wiped during updates” – meaning they did not retain federally required voter data. If voting machines were wiped before expiration of the 22-month federal retention period, this

Voting Machines Wiped During Vendor Updates (WI) Read More »