Reasonable Inference [Established Fact – Funding pattern and terms] The five Democratic-plurality “Zuckerberg 5” cities (Milwaukee, Madison, Green Bay, Racine, Kenosha) received 8.8 million dollars in CTCL grants bound by the “Wisconsin Safe Voting Plan.” Funds paid for “voter navigators,” geo-fenced targeting, and specific demographic outreach (e.g., Latinx and African American communities) rather than neutral […]
Wisconsin Safe Voting Plan (WI) Read More »
Reasonable Inference The five Democratic-plurality “Zuckerberg 5” cities — Milwaukee, Madison, Green Bay, Racine, and Kenosha — received a total of $8.8 million in CTCL grants, all conditioned on implementation of the “Wisconsin Safe Voting Plan,” a joint election operations framework developed by those cities at CTCL’s direction. Grant funds were contractually bound to that
Wisconsin Safe Voting Plan and Election Bribery (WI) Read More »
Established Fact The Wisconsin OSC (Gableman) Special Counsel Report documented that ESS voting tabulators deployed statewide were equipped with active 4G wireless modems enabling internet connectivity. In Green Bay, all ESS voting machines were connected to a secret, hidden Wi-Fi access point located at the Grand Hyatt hotel – the central count facility – controlled
ESS Tabulators with 4G Modems; Hidden Wi-Fi at Central Count (WI) Read More »
Established Fact The OSC found that ESS voting machines deployed in Wisconsin contain 4G wireless modems enabling internet connectivity. At least one Wisconsin municipality admitted its machines were connected to the internet on election night, purportedly to transmit vote data to county clerks. All Green Bay voting machines were ESS machines connected to the secret
Disputed Fact Wisconsin municipalities leveraged COVID-19 spacing restrictions to unlawfully restrict poll challengers and citizen observers from meaningfully overseeing L&A testing. Wis. Stat. § 5.84 guarantees any elector the right to observe pre-election testing of automatic voting equipment. The use of public health rules to enforce the practical equivalent of exclusion from these tests violated
