Reasonable Inference

Bowyer v. Ducey, No. 2:20-cv-02321-DJH (D. Ariz.) – Dismissed for Standing; Claims Mischaracterized as Evidence Failure (AZ)

Arizona, Case Dismissal, Judicial Malfeasance, Reasonable Inference, United States /

Reasonable Interference [Reasonable Inference – Characterization as evidence dismissal is misleading] A federal lawsuit alleging large-scale election fraud and seeking to decertify Arizona’s election results was dismissed for lack of legal standing. The presiding judge described the claims as “sorely wanting of relevant or reliable evidence” and noted entertaining the suit “would cause extreme and […]

Bowyer v. Ducey, No. 2:20-cv-02321-DJH (D. Ariz.) – Dismissed for Standing; Claims Mischaracterized as Evidence Failure (AZ) Read More »

Financial Audit Needed in Trump v. Biden – Wisconsin Supreme Court 4-3 Dismissal on Laches of Claims re: “Democracy in the Park,” Indefinitely Confined Voters, and Altered Certification Envelopes (WI)

Bribery, Judicial Malfeasance, Reasonable Inference, United States, Wisconsin /

Reasonable Inference [Reasonable Inference – As to financial audit need] In Trump v. Biden (Wis. Sup. Ct. 2020), the Wisconsin Supreme Court dismissed three of four election challenge claims under the doctrine of laches in a 4-3 decision. The dismissed claims included challenges to (1) the WEC’s absentee ballot distribution in “Democracy in the Park”

Financial Audit Needed in Trump v. Biden – Wisconsin Supreme Court 4-3 Dismissal on Laches of Claims re: “Democracy in the Park,” Indefinitely Confined Voters, and Altered Certification Envelopes (WI) Read More »

Quid Pro Quo CEIR-Linked Private Funding of Legal Defense for Subpoenaed Election Officials (WI)

Bribery, Brown County, Dane County, Judicial Malfeasance, Milwaukee County, Racine County, Reasonable Inference, United States, Wisconsin /

Reasonable Inference [Reasonable Inference – As to ethics violation and quid pro quo structure] The Wisconsin Office of the Special Counsel (OSC), led by former Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice Michael Gableman, documented in its Second Interim Investigative Report that the Election Officials Legal Defense Network (EOLDN) – an organization linked through funding networks to the

Quid Pro Quo CEIR-Linked Private Funding of Legal Defense for Subpoenaed Election Officials (WI) Read More »

Financial Incentives Behind Kelly v. Commonwealth – Pennsylvania Supreme Court Dismissal (PA)

Bribery, Judicial Malfeasance, Pennsylvania, Reasonable Inference, United States /

Reasonable Inference [Reasonable Inference – As to investigative need for financial relationship audit] In Kelly v. Commonwealth, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court dismissed a facial constitutional challenge to Act 77 of 2019 – the statute authorizing universal no-excuse mail-in voting – on the doctrine of laches, ruling that plaintiffs had waited too long after the law’s

Financial Incentives Behind Kelly v. Commonwealth – Pennsylvania Supreme Court Dismissal (PA) Read More »

MI SoS Jocelyn Benson Bribed MI Supreme Court Justice with Michigan Legacy PAC – $82,500 Contribution From Defendant Benson’s Political Apparatus to Justice Kyra Harris Bolden’s Campaign During Pendency of O’Halloran v. Benson (MI)

Bribery, Judicial Malfeasance, Michigan, Reasonable Inference, United States /

Reasonable Inference [Reasonable Inference – As to the constitutional impropriety under Caperton] Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson’s political fundraising entity, “Michigan Legacy PAC,” made a $82,500 contribution to the campaign of Michigan Supreme Court Justice Kyra Harris Bolden in April 2024. At the time the contribution was made, Secretary Benson was an active defendant

MI SoS Jocelyn Benson Bribed MI Supreme Court Justice with Michigan Legacy PAC – $82,500 Contribution From Defendant Benson’s Political Apparatus to Justice Kyra Harris Bolden’s Campaign During Pendency of O’Halloran v. Benson (MI) Read More »

Misappropriation of Public Funds by DA Fani Willis and Special Prosecutor Nathan Wade (GA)

Bribery, Fulton County, Georgia, Judicial Malfeasance, Reasonable Inference, United States /

Reasonable Inference [Reasonable Inference – That appearance created non-neutral prosecutorial incentives] Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis, the officer of the court responsible for prosecuting individuals who challenged the 2020 election results in Georgia – including former President Trump and eighteen co-defendants – was found by Fulton County Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee to have

Misappropriation of Public Funds by DA Fani Willis and Special Prosecutor Nathan Wade (GA) Read More »

Ward v. Jackson – Government Counsel’s Representation to Arizona Supreme Court That Ballots Were Segregated; Physical State of Ballot Corpus Inconsistent with Representation (AZ)

Arizona, Bribery, Judicial Malfeasance, Maricopa County, Reasonable Inference, United States /

Reasonable Inference In Ward v. Jackson, Arizona Supreme Court Case No. CV2020-015285, the Secretary of State’s counsel represented to the court that the challenged ballots had been segregated and preserved in a manner that would permit the relief requested. The Cyber Ninjas audit, completed in September 2021, found that the physical ballot corpus was not

Ward v. Jackson – Government Counsel’s Representation to Arizona Supreme Court That Ballots Were Segregated; Physical State of Ballot Corpus Inconsistent with Representation (AZ) Read More »

Alleged RICO Bribery Network Among Maricopa County Superior Court Judges – Harris/Thaler Law Firm Criminal Investigation (AZ)

Arizona, Bribery, Judicial Malfeasance, Maricopa County, Reasonable Inference, United States /

Reasonable Inference [Reasonable Inference aspect of this finding] An extensive investigation by the Harris/Thaler Law Firm, submitted as a formal brief in Maricopa County Superior Court criminal case CR2021-134056, alleged that public officials – including more than two dozen judges of the Maricopa County Superior Court – accepted bribes to protect racketeering enterprises and to

Alleged RICO Bribery Network Among Maricopa County Superior Court Judges – Harris/Thaler Law Firm Criminal Investigation (AZ) Read More »

ElectionSource (Dominion Subcontractor) Directed Battery Removal from Voting Machines – Resetting Configuration Data and Destroying Forensic Evidence (MI)

Election Record Integrity, Michigan, Reasonable Inference, Record Destruction, United States /

Reasonable Inference [Reasonable Inference – Characterization as evidence destruction] ElectionSource – a Dominion Voting Systems subcontractor under Michigan State Contract #071B7700117 – issued letters to county clerks directing “preventative maintenance” that included the removal of internal batteries from voting machines. Per voting machine operations manuals, battery removal resets a machine to factory default settings, erasing

ElectionSource (Dominion Subcontractor) Directed Battery Removal from Voting Machines – Resetting Configuration Data and Destroying Forensic Evidence (MI) Read More »

LA County appears to be election fraud “proving ground” (CA)

California, Los Angeles County, Pre-Election Conspiracy, Reasonable Inference, Seditious Conspiracy, United States /

Reasonable Inference [Reasonable Inference] Los Angeles County serves as a concentration point for multiple election technology vendors — including Smartmatic (ballot marking devices, $282M contract), KNOWiNK (e-pollbooks), Runbeck (mail ballot processing), AT&T FirstNet (communications infrastructure), CIS/EI-ISAC (cybersecurity), and Konnech/PollChief (poll worker scheduling) — operating simultaneously in the largest U.S. election jurisdiction. Federal prosecutors allege (2025)

LA County appears to be election fraud “proving ground” (CA) Read More »