Established Fact

King v. Whitmer, No. 20-13134 (E.D. Mich.) – Dismissed on Five Compounded Procedural Grounds; “Speculation and Conjecture” Language Absent Discovery (MI)

Case Dismissal, Established Fact, Judicial Malfeasance, Michigan, United States /

Established Fact A federal lawsuit seeking to decertify Michigan’s election based on widespread fraud allegations and Dominion machine vulnerabilities was dismissed on five simultaneous procedural grounds: Eleventh Amendment immunity, laches, lack of standing, mootness, and abstention doctrines. The judge additionally characterized the claims as based on “nothing but speculation and conjecture” – language subsequently cited

King v. Whitmer, No. 20-13134 (E.D. Mich.) – Dismissed on Five Compounded Procedural Grounds; “Speculation and Conjecture” Language Absent Discovery (MI) Read More »

Circular “Ripeness / Mootness” Trap – Pre-Election Claims Premature; Post-Certification Claims Moot (GA)

Case Dismissal, Established Fact, Georgia, Judicial Malfeasance, United States /

Established Fact [Established Fact – Dismissals before and after election on procedural grounds] Georgia courts dismissed pre-election challenges to expanded absentee and drop-box procedures as “not yet ripe” because the challenged election had not yet occurred. After the election, courts dismissed the same or analogous challenges on mootness grounds because certification had occurred. This bidirectional

Circular “Ripeness / Mootness” Trap – Pre-Election Claims Premature; Post-Certification Claims Moot (GA) Read More »

Wood v. Raffensperger, No. 1:20-cv-04651-SDG (N.D. Ga.), aff’d 11th Cir. – Standing and Laches; Affirmed as Moot Post-Certification (GA)

Case Dismissal, Established Fact, Georgia, Judicial Malfeasance, United States /

Established Fact A lawsuit challenging absentee ballot signature verification procedures and seeking to prohibit certification was dismissed by the District Court for lack of standing and laches, then affirmed by the Eleventh Circuit on the additional ground that the case had become moot once results were certified. The plaintiffs alleged that Georgia’s failure to enforce

Wood v. Raffensperger, No. 1:20-cv-04651-SDG (N.D. Ga.), aff’d 11th Cir. – Standing and Laches; Affirmed as Moot Post-Certification (GA) Read More »

DoJ Lawsuits To Obtain State Election Records Required to Determine HAVA and NVRA Compliance Dismissed (US)

Case Dismissal, Established Fact, Judicial Malfeasance, United States /

Established Fact Courts have dismissed DoJ lawsuits demanding access to records needed to verify HAVA and NVRA compliance. Michigan, Georgia, Oregon and California cases were dismissed. Other suits are pending. These lawsuits cite HAVA and the NVRA as legal authority, but federal courts have so far rejected the argument that either statute compels states to

DoJ Lawsuits To Obtain State Election Records Required to Determine HAVA and NVRA Compliance Dismissed (US) Read More »

Systemic Speed of Post-Election Dismissals Precluded Forensic Evidence Presentation – Statewide (AZ)

Arizona, Case Dismissal, Established Fact, Judicial Malfeasance, United States /

Established Fact [Established Fact – Timing of dismissals vs. completion of audits] Multiple Arizona post-election challenges were dismissed in December 2020 – within weeks of election certification – on standing, mootness, or procedural grounds. The Cyber Ninjas audit was not completed until September 2021, and forensic analyses by Ben Cotton (CyFIR) and Jovan Pulitzer were

Systemic Speed of Post-Election Dismissals Precluded Forensic Evidence Presentation – Statewide (AZ) Read More »

Ward v. Jackson, No. CV2020-015285 (Ariz. S. Ct.) – Comingling & Representations by Government Counsel That Contradict Physical Record (AZ)

Arizona, Case Dismissal, Established Fact, Judicial Malfeasance, United States /

Established Fact [Established Fact – Representation was made; commingling was documented post-litigation] The Arizona Supreme Court adjudicated a challenge to the 2020 election results in which the Secretary of State’s counsel represented that original and duplicate ballots “are, by statute, segregated and preserved.” The Cyber Ninjas audit subsequently established that ballot boxes delivered for audit

Ward v. Jackson, No. CV2020-015285 (Ariz. S. Ct.) – Comingling & Representations by Government Counsel That Contradict Physical Record (AZ) Read More »

Trump v. Biden – Wisconsin Supreme Court 4-3 Dismissal on Laches of Claims re: “Democracy in the Park,” Indefinitely Confined Voters, and Altered Certification Envelopes (WI)

Bribery, Established Fact, Judicial Malfeasance, United States, Wisconsin /

Established Fact [Established Fact – As to 4-3 ruling and dismissal basis] In Trump v. Biden (Wis. Sup. Ct. 2020), the Wisconsin Supreme Court dismissed three of four election challenge claims under the doctrine of laches in a 4-3 decision. The dismissed claims included challenges to (1) the WEC’s absentee ballot distribution in “Democracy in

Trump v. Biden – Wisconsin Supreme Court 4-3 Dismissal on Laches of Claims re: “Democracy in the Park,” Indefinitely Confined Voters, and Altered Certification Envelopes (WI) Read More »

Election Officials Legal Defense Network (EOLDN) – CEIR-Linked Private Funding of Legal Defense for Subpoenaed Election Officials; Providing “Anything of Value” to Procure Non-Compliance With Legislative Oversight (WI)

Bribery, Brown County, Dane County, Established Fact, Judicial Malfeasance, Milwaukee County, Racine County, United States, Wisconsin /

Established Fact [Established Fact – As to EOLDN existence and free counsel provision] The Wisconsin Office of the Special Counsel (OSC), led by former Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice Michael Gableman, documented in its Second Interim Investigative Report that the Election Officials Legal Defense Network (EOLDN) – an organization linked through funding networks to the Center

Election Officials Legal Defense Network (EOLDN) – CEIR-Linked Private Funding of Legal Defense for Subpoenaed Election Officials; Providing “Anything of Value” to Procure Non-Compliance With Legislative Oversight (WI) Read More »

Kelly v. Commonwealth – Pennsylvania Supreme Court Dismissed Mail-In Ballot Constitutional Challenge on Laches Without Addressing Act 77’s Constitutionality (PA)

Bribery, Established Fact, Judicial Malfeasance, Pennsylvania, United States /

Established Fact [Established Fact – As to dismissal and its legal effect] In Kelly v. Commonwealth, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court dismissed a facial constitutional challenge to Act 77 of 2019 – the statute authorizing universal no-excuse mail-in voting – on the doctrine of laches, ruling that plaintiffs had waited too long after the law’s passage

Kelly v. Commonwealth – Pennsylvania Supreme Court Dismissed Mail-In Ballot Constitutional Challenge on Laches Without Addressing Act 77’s Constitutionality (PA) Read More »

Private “Zuckerbucks” CTCL Funding Injected Into Specific Counties; Every Legal Challenge to Targeted Funding Dismissed (PA)

Bribery, Established Fact, Judicial Malfeasance, Pennsylvania, United States /

Established Fact [Established Fact – As to CTCL funding and judicial dismissals] While direct bribery of a Pennsylvania judge is not explicitly documented in the source record, the investigative record establishes the following sequence: (1) millions of dollars in private CTCL grants were injected into specific Pennsylvania counties – including Philadelphia, Delaware, and Centre Counties

Private “Zuckerbucks” CTCL Funding Injected Into Specific Counties; Every Legal Challenge to Targeted Funding Dismissed (PA) Read More »